Thoughts on a Bulgarian-led Yugoslavia?

by KeepOnConversing

26 comments
  1. Кво стаа ся? Сърбите ли ще ме превземат или руснаците. Кажете да знам дали да почвам да уча руски или сръбски.

  2. No. If the Balkans are to unite, it should be a confederation with all groups in the union having autonomy and equal rights. Anything else is nationalist circlejerking.

  3. Kingdom of Yugoslavia with 1945 borders, good luck to government

  4. Wouldn’t have worked. Balkan nations detest each-other way too strongly to form a stable union (no matter what name you call it). The Serbs pretty much tried to make Yugoslavia a Serbian empire and we all know where it ended. We (our ancestors) would have tried to make it a Bulgarian empire with the same results.

    All of our nations need still more time and growth for such a thing to possibly work, and definitely not as a kingdom.

  5. Единни, силни и обединени балкани определено биха развалили добрия сън на доста държави в Европа, Азия и Северна америка.

  6. Bro, stop posting this everywhere around the Balkan subs 😆

  7. Кралство определено не, по-късния вариант е по-доброто, но пак, да не се централизира около една нация и да се разиграват имперски амбиции. Още повече в модерен вариант, една обща икономическа зона и по-близка кооперация биха били далеч по-полезни. Всички от изредените тънкопишльовски нации са изгърмели 5-6 милиони републички, включително и България. Не е въпрос площта. Така поне ще бъде дадено свободно движение на една маса от 30на милиона души. Да някои райони ще го ядат, но пък други ще живнат, барем да не сме градове държави.

  8. Then the name is wrong. It is Grand Bulgaria. Or at least Bulgaroslavia.

  9. At least 4 bankruptcies. Bailed out by ussr after sending them 65 train carrieges of gold. So, no.

  10. There wasn’t enough problems in old Yugoslavia, so lets do another one with some more?

  11. There could never be a Bulgarian-led Yugoslavia. Realistically the country would barely function, because Bulgaria and Serbia would be engaged in a dick measuring contest all the time(that was a legit fear of Tito if Bulgaria had joined Yugoslavia in the 50s)

  12. Шизофренията се терапира вече. Потърси помощ!

  13. Nice try, Александър Стамболийски.

  14. I do not think this was realistic during communist times. For such a unification to be possible, you need a strong Bulgaria. The way I see it, it could happen in one of two ways – Bulgaria wins the Second Balkan War or the central powers win WW1.

    For Bulgaria to win the Second Balkan War, Turkey and Romania needed to remain neutral (for reasons unknown, especially Turkey has no reason to remain neutral). If Bulgaria defeated Greece and Serbia before WW1, it could become the major power in the Balkans and unite Yugoslavia under it. However, this option is improbable, because as stated above, Turkey and Romania have no reason to remain neutral. Plus, the catastrophe that followed this lost war changed Bulgaria so much, that I cannot imagine what Bulgarian history would be without it. Bulgarian despair starts with this loss and continues for the next 100 years.

    As for the Central powers winning WW1, I think you might find some alternate history theories here or on YouTube.

    Nevertheless, I don’t think it would be a stable country – most Balkan nations think they deserve more than they currently have. In the end, maybe you dodge the Kosovo War, or maybe something worse happens. For this to actually work, the Balkan nations have to stop hating each other and start working together for their common interest.

  15. Majku vi jebem fashistichku 😀
    Pushtaj srbete, rezhi rukijata i sipvaj salatata !

  16. “Bulgarian led” dosen’t translate to “Bulgarian co-dominant” nor “federal republic oriented Yugoslavia”.

    If the Bulgarian leader is going to be some radical Serboman who follows the Serbian nationalist agenda and hates our very existence we might as well have had accepted Tito’s proposal for “Germanization” in context of dissolution to 500 trillion puppet states with the ultimate goal of social divide.

    Testiment to that is Croatia with it’s Yugoslav leaders who managed to become somehow both “Pro-Serbian” from Croatian prespective, and “Croatian nationalist” from Yugo-Serb prespective whenever they had made some controversial reform for Serbian chauvinism like loosening the leash on Albania.

    But if you mean it in the context of the ideals of our Anarchist Revolutionaries like Botev, Levski, Petko Voivoda, and Goce Delchev it would have been interesting to thing about as those guys would immidietly either start beef against the world status quo of colonial reality, or tripp on power and become corrupted politicians with beef against their subjects.

Comments are closed.