>She concluded the reason claimed by the Ivy for the women’s dismissal was not the real reason why they were sacked.
>The court also said Mr Belton’s claim that he was unaware Ms Laiermanova and Ms Marciniak were active members of the Unite trade union was not credible.
>Ms O’Donnell said the evidence supported the contention of both claimants that allegations of misconduct made against them were an attempt to hide the real reason for their dismissal
Essentially dismissed for Union organising. Good to see the Labour Court set out strongly that this won’t be accepted.
Another reason to avoid that shambolic influencer’s hole.
Will they pay it out of the tips they confiscate?
Seems like a nice place to avoid for life.
I hadn’t heard about any of this, but was there a couple of weeks ago with my girlfriend and the food wasn’t great. Wouldn’t have wasted our time if we’d known this is how they treat employees.
Time to boycott the restaurant
It’s an odd defence. “We didn’t dismiss them for union activities but because they wouldn’t let someone leave a tip.” Wouldn’t that also be a wrongful termination?
7 comments
>She concluded the reason claimed by the Ivy for the women’s dismissal was not the real reason why they were sacked.
>The court also said Mr Belton’s claim that he was unaware Ms Laiermanova and Ms Marciniak were active members of the Unite trade union was not credible.
>Ms O’Donnell said the evidence supported the contention of both claimants that allegations of misconduct made against them were an attempt to hide the real reason for their dismissal
Essentially dismissed for Union organising. Good to see the Labour Court set out strongly that this won’t be accepted.
Another reason to avoid that shambolic influencer’s hole.
Will they pay it out of the tips they confiscate?
Seems like a nice place to avoid for life.
I hadn’t heard about any of this, but was there a couple of weeks ago with my girlfriend and the food wasn’t great. Wouldn’t have wasted our time if we’d known this is how they treat employees.
Time to boycott the restaurant
It’s an odd defence. “We didn’t dismiss them for union activities but because they wouldn’t let someone leave a tip.” Wouldn’t that also be a wrongful termination?