Viņi domāja ka tā ir cita zīme??? Notika staro Rīga 2024 / they might have thought it was a different sign??? Happened in staro Rīga 2024

by i_love_Crash_Bandi

12 comments
  1. This is not another sign. This is plainly swastika. They can be both-sided, btw

    Whole other question is, if swastika should be banned/not used in Europe.

    As you know, USSR signs are banned in Latvia, including hammer and sickle.

    Hammer and sickle are not bad per se, but the sign is traumatic for many. So, the context is important.

    My take – either ban both, or allow both. There are plenty of Latvian patterns to choose from, Ugunskrusts is not mandatory to show patriotism.

  2. Viss kārtība, kamēr kāds nesāks bļāvāt vāciski.

    /s vāciski arī būs ok.

  3. Interesanti. Parasti kreivu vate par šo bļauj. Varbūt kiāds angliski iemācījies.

  4. Well, in the mythos it’s supposed to protect the wearer against evil. So I guess the devil saw it and got triggered. 🤫

  5. Kas nu būtu gaidījis, ka ārzemniekiem nepatīk smieklīgais krustiņš

Comments are closed.