NATO can provide Ukraine with missiles with a range of up to 5500 km

18 comments

1. Anything but Tomahawks that would fit into that group?

2. Respectfully, we already knew this. NATO can also fire nukes at Moscow, it doesn’t mean they’re going to.

3. They said medium range missiles.

   Which by definition have a range of 1000km to 5500km

4. Hope they do provide them.. along with the exact coordinates of each of Putins mega mansions.

5. For context: Kiev to Pyongyang is 7000km.

6. It’s a deal if they can get a 1000 of those.

7. Is there any missile system other than Typhon that´s land based and ready to go for Ukraine?

   Giving Ukraine Tomahawk´s is one thing, but the launch system is another, especially as Typhon is less than a year old.

8. It would be kind of funny if nato provided ICBMs with conventional warheads and let Ukraine fire them at North Korea. Quite the uno reverse

9. The resolution 494 mentions “medium-range missiles”, which could mean the existing missiles too. SCALP/Storm Shadow is listed as long-range cruise missile.

   I can understand the excitement on Ukrainian sources, but it’s wishful thinking.

   The ranges people mention are for ballistic missiles.

10. Do it

11. 3300 miles for Americans: the distance from Los Angeles to Bangor, Maine.

12. “Sure, we *can* provide you with what you need to send Russia packing. But *will* we? We’re going to keep you guessing on that one.”

13. We can. Doesn’t mean we should. Doesn’t mean we will.

14. Moscow is only 500 km away.

15. Don’t tell Joe Rogan, he’ll poop his hobbit pants.

16. They should hit St. Basil’s out of spite.

17. Moscow is <1000 miles (~1640km) away from Kiev.

18. Is Costco selling underground bunkers? I may need to pick up one or two.

Comments are closed.