Putin Threatens To Use Missile Which Is ‘Comparable In Strength To Nuclear Strike’

https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/putin-threatens-to-use-missile-comparable-to-nuclear-strike_uk_67497ecce4b0e49e029f120e

33 comments

  1. Vendor : “this baby is comparable to a nuclear strike”

    Reveal the content

    It’s a nuclear strike, but sold as non nuclear, so maybe he can fool the international community and have some time to go to his bunker.

  3. >The kinetic impact is powerful, like a meteorite falling. We know in history what meteorites have fallen where, and what the consequences were. Sometimes it was enough for whole lakes to form.

    He’s REALLY been dwelling on this comparisson since the Dnipro strike. Kinda makes you wonder if NATO has developed an orbital kinetic bombardment capability and he’s dick measuring.

  4. This dude really has reached Kim Jong Un level’s of blustering at the point.

    Probably a bit lower considering how much Kim is propping up his army and munitions.

  8. It’s got a big “NOT A NUCLEAR WEAPON” sticker on it, therefore it is not per ruZZian thought processes.

  9. I thought this dude had cancer and was on death’s door two years ago?

  10. He’s talking about the “Father of All Bombs” FOAB, its a massive thermobaric bomb and Russia have actually used these types of weapons already in Ukraine just not one on this scale. It is the largest non-nuclear weapon by yield i believe of any currently deployed bomb at about 44t of TNT. That’s still pretty small in comparison to a nuclear bomb little boy for instance was 15Kt of TNT. It is however bigger than the smallest nuclear device ever created the “Davy Crockett” was 20t of TNT but that was a very small bomb.

    So yeah, the Russians do have a pretty big non-nuclear bomb they could use that is factually true. Its important to remember though that this has been the case for all of the war and they have actually already used some weapons that use this same technology.

    Its just more of the same from Putin.

  14. He’s gone full North-Korean.

    You never go full North-Korean…

  16. He’s been threatening to threat and acted in ways that have been threatening to threat and intimated and threat for a long time, you better listen or else!!

    He’s in a weak spot, threats come weakness, he’s more than the war, no one respects him, someone on the inside will take him out.

  18. Putin acknowledges he can’t fire Nuclear Missile and instead relies on “similar threat”. In short, Putin fears the consequences of firing a nuke.

  19. Yes, and if my grandmother had wheels she’d be a bicycle.

  20. he probably will use it, since nobody really seems to be doing enough already.

  21. If Putin no longer existed the world would be far better off. He is the single biggest problem the planet has right now and he needs to go.

  22. He has a rocket that can hoist 15 thousand tonnes? And that’s just the first nuke ever used.

    We’ll accept that there are better explosives than tnt now but even so.

    It’s about as believable as the one missile and the entire UK vanishes.

  23. There’s a lonely hole with his name on it, just waiting for him. A dictators end is rarely pleasant. Tick tok.

  24. He didn’t actually say this…he said he would use a range of missiles with the combined equivalent of a Nuke. It was an absolutely pathetic speech thinking warheads are supercharged because they enter the atmosphere at 4000 degrees the apparently to him same heat as the sun.

    It was frankly a weak and pathetic attempt at scaring the NATO block who quite conversely would be prepared to premptive strike this arsehole the moment it looks like he might launch icbms. He is shitting his knickers.

  27. Invading Ukraine just to end up fake nuking it is a brilliant strategy.

    “I’m going to rob this bank so slowly that it turns into a hostage situation. Then I’m going to burn the cash as a distraction while I try to escape”

    This is what single party rule, yes-men, and corruption bring you.

    A false sense that wars are easy and the belief that your equipment isn’t garbage.

  29. > Putin told reporters at a Kazakhstan press conference that this ballistic missile is “comparable in strength to a nuclear strike” **if used repeatedly on one area.**

    Probably an important detail.

  31. “Putin told reporters at a Kazakhstan press conference that this ballistic missile is “comparable in strength to a nuclear strike” if used repeatedly on one area.”

    So like every other bomb and missile as long as you use it repeatedly on one area long enough.

  32. Yeah they’re launching Steven Seagal out of a trebuchet

  33. The only feasible comparable weapon would an orbital kinetic strike, which would be excessively expensive for Russia to use, and it would still be a WMD and trigger an international response.

Comments are closed.