NATO wants to put Ukraine in a position of strength for any Russia peace talks

12 comments

1. Tell that to Donald.

2. Ok but why did they put Ukraine in the position of weakness in the first place?

3. Wouldn’t surprise me if Trump threatens to militarily assist Russia if Ukraine doesn’t agree to cede land.

4. The more urgent the threat is, the more people are talking about it, the more relevant and important NATO is. It’s in NATO’s best interest to keep the coals smoldering.

5. Then do it already

6. How about NATO put Russia in a place where they get an offer that they can’t refuse? Know what I mean?

7. Words are cheap.

8. Every Russian official is a valid military target.

9. “wants to” is a long way from “will”

10. Prove that by increasing supplies and unrestricted usage of long range missiles against Russian military and infrastructures supporting their war efforts.

11. NATO will not be able to do this simply because it requires NATO to do the deeds of the strong. And NATO with its constant state of fear of escalation, of not recognising Russian hybrid attacks (and not very hybrid, because fires in warehouses and factories are not hybrid attacks at all) on NATO structures is itself in a position of weakness.

12. Why would russia negotiate when you signal weakness.

Comments are closed.