Paywall but nothing much more than the title. The greens now no longer veto 2 nuclear plants remaining open but they do hitch their other demands on it: 6% BTW on electricity AND gas, also faster switch to renewables.
Deur terug toe! Denk aan uw verbruik!
Why is somebody with ties to Gazprom still involved in the energy debate of our country? Tinne should be under investigation, not earning €5000+ being a minister and at the same time trying her best to get her bonus from Gazprom.
Only logical solution. Nuclear, as long as possible.
No other option even comes close
Voor de 4 recentste kerncentrales AUB, niet voor 2 .
Moeten we nog steeds de ramen openzetten en de dampkap aan als er volk komt eten?
What annoys me again:
She explicitly says: plan a (close nuclear) is technically and legally fully investigated, but we are open to plan b
But wasn’t the whole point of extending the deadline until mid march to properly investigate both options, to be able to actually compare them? Because this still is very much ‘look plan a is doable, let’s just do that’. This was explicitly what Bouchez wanted, and at least on this point I fully agree with him. Tinne had the task to investigate both options and compare. Not only investigate her own preferred option
Wat maakt het uit?
Die Groenen hebben alles zitten uitsluiten in het begin.
Engie en andere specialisten hebben keer en keer aangegeven dat de termijn om die verlenging te starten al lang overschreden is.
Maw: technisch kan het, Engie wil niet .
Als de overheid weeral eens terugkomt op haar afspraken dan zal Engie echt alles uit de kast halen om die wanhopige overheid om al het geld uit hun zak te kloppen.
De grote winnaar is Engie: dikke 500 miljoen subsidie voor gascentrales, en nu nog eens dikke subsidie’s om die kerncentrales te blijven open te houden.
Imo moet men ook direct nieuwe bouwen. Die zijn dan pas maar operationeel binnen 10j.
Please also build more Nuclear plants.
its the greenest solution that can sustain the population. When the other possibility’s provide the same level of electricity generation, then we can move from nuclear…
Maybe not such a bad idea, have they finally realised you cannot replace over 50% of your electrical generation in 5 years or less?
Better yet, invest in more modern, even safer nuclear plants, いいえ？
[Friendly reminder that the International Energy Agency specifically mentions not only keeping the 2 newest plants open, but also keeping Doel 3 and Tihange 2 open toghetter with the 3 remaining German nuclear plants.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FNBDHbgXwAIVkbv?format=png&name=900×900)
Makes sense. This is an actual reason to extend them. I still believe nuclear energy is holding back renewable energy, but if we’re tied to gas by a hostile country, there is no other option to keep nuclear plants open. But we need to make sure this is not just going to line some French multinationals pockets, but the excess money gets invested in renewable energy in Belgium.
Omdat ze weten dat ze anders de kiesdrempel niet halen in 2024.
i hope belgium wont invest more in its military, theirs no way we could contribute meaninfully in this way and a arms race is a loosers game.
better to invest in more nuclear energy and become a net exporter especialy to germany reducing their gas needs refucing the global demand for gas refucing its price helping both the enviroment and making russia more dependant on its population making them better educated and giving them more power in general.
(this doesnt mean we should stop transitting gas)
this is the best I believe we (as belgians) can do
Wouldn’t it be better to invest in modernising the nuclear power plants?
17 comments
Paywall but nothing much more than the title. The greens now no longer veto 2 nuclear plants remaining open but they do hitch their other demands on it: 6% BTW on electricity AND gas, also faster switch to renewables.
Deur terug toe! Denk aan uw verbruik!
Why is somebody with ties to Gazprom still involved in the energy debate of our country? Tinne should be under investigation, not earning €5000+ being a minister and at the same time trying her best to get her bonus from Gazprom.
Only logical solution. Nuclear, as long as possible.
No other option even comes close
Voor de 4 recentste kerncentrales AUB, niet voor 2 .
Moeten we nog steeds de ramen openzetten en de dampkap aan als er volk komt eten?
What annoys me again:
She explicitly says: plan a (close nuclear) is technically and legally fully investigated, but we are open to plan b
But wasn’t the whole point of extending the deadline until mid march to properly investigate both options, to be able to actually compare them? Because this still is very much ‘look plan a is doable, let’s just do that’. This was explicitly what Bouchez wanted, and at least on this point I fully agree with him. Tinne had the task to investigate both options and compare. Not only investigate her own preferred option
Wat maakt het uit?
Die Groenen hebben alles zitten uitsluiten in het begin.
Engie en andere specialisten hebben keer en keer aangegeven dat de termijn om die verlenging te starten al lang overschreden is.
Maw: technisch kan het, Engie wil niet .
Als de overheid weeral eens terugkomt op haar afspraken dan zal Engie echt alles uit de kast halen om die wanhopige overheid om al het geld uit hun zak te kloppen.
De grote winnaar is Engie: dikke 500 miljoen subsidie voor gascentrales, en nu nog eens dikke subsidie’s om die kerncentrales te blijven open te houden.
Imo moet men ook direct nieuwe bouwen. Die zijn dan pas maar operationeel binnen 10j.
Please also build more Nuclear plants.
its the greenest solution that can sustain the population. When the other possibility’s provide the same level of electricity generation, then we can move from nuclear…
Maybe not such a bad idea, have they finally realised you cannot replace over 50% of your electrical generation in 5 years or less?
Better yet, invest in more modern, even safer nuclear plants, いいえ？
[Friendly reminder that the International Energy Agency specifically mentions not only keeping the 2 newest plants open, but also keeping Doel 3 and Tihange 2 open toghetter with the 3 remaining German nuclear plants.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FNBDHbgXwAIVkbv?format=png&name=900×900)
Makes sense. This is an actual reason to extend them. I still believe nuclear energy is holding back renewable energy, but if we’re tied to gas by a hostile country, there is no other option to keep nuclear plants open. But we need to make sure this is not just going to line some French multinationals pockets, but the excess money gets invested in renewable energy in Belgium.
Omdat ze weten dat ze anders de kiesdrempel niet halen in 2024.
i hope belgium wont invest more in its military, theirs no way we could contribute meaninfully in this way and a arms race is a loosers game.
better to invest in more nuclear energy and become a net exporter especialy to germany reducing their gas needs refucing the global demand for gas refucing its price helping both the enviroment and making russia more dependant on its population making them better educated and giving them more power in general.
(this doesnt mean we should stop transitting gas)
this is the best I believe we (as belgians) can do
Wouldn’t it be better to invest in modernising the nuclear power plants?
Paywall problemen los je zo op:
https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.standaard.be%2Fcnt%2Fdmf20220306_98034065
[removed]