Concerns Raised Over Fishing and Marine Impacts

EU Member States have agreed on updated goals for deploying offshore renewable energy across Europe’s five sea basins, with targets set for 2030, 2040, and 2050.

The new objectives aim to increase installed capacity from the current 20 GW to approximately 88 GW by 2030 and up to 360 GW by 2050. While these milestones underscore the EU’s commitment to energy security and decarbonisation, the rapid expansion raises significant concerns for fishing communities, coastal economies, and marine ecosystems.

 

A Trans-European Approach to Renewable Expansion

At a virtual meeting of Directors-General of Energy Ministries, Member States adopted non-binding agreements to pursue a coordinated, trans-European approach to offshore grid development. The updated targets are supported by the TEN-E Regulation, which provides a framework for integrated offshore and onshore grid planning, tackling bottlenecks and minimising environmental impacts.

The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO-E) will now update its strategic integrated Offshore Network Development Plans (ONDPs), providing visibility for investors and grid promoters on upcoming projects within each sea basin.

 

Implications for Fishing Communities

While the renewable energy transition is critical to addressing climate change, the rapid expansion of offshore wind farms and other projects presents severe challenges for the fishing industry.

1. Spatial Conflicts: Fishing communities across Europe have already expressed concern over being squeezed out of traditional fishing grounds by offshore energy developments. The cumulative impact of these projects, particularly in areas such as the North Sea and Baltic Sea, could lead to significant economic losses for fishers who rely on these waters for their livelihoods.

2. Economic Displacement: Coastal communities dependent on fishing could face cascading economic effects, with job losses in catching, processing, and associated industries. Without clear compensation mechanisms or alternative livelihood programmes, these regions risk long-term economic instability.