King Charles strips UK brands of royal warrant – including Marmite

13 comments

1. Horrible stuff.
   Especially the marmite crisps they did.

2. I shall be buying more marmite and cadburys to support them in their royal persecution.

3. A step in the right direction. A hereditary autocrat does not have any specialised skills for establishing quality produce. If he could carry on fucking off out of normal society that would be great.

4. Say what you want about Harry not looking the part, but Charles is definitely Liz’s son

5. But everyone loves or hates marmite…what could be more appropriate?

6. Bring on the marmite Republic

7. It Nestle still gets it? Should have nixed that one over a decade ago.

   This one also makes sense, but the mark is still devalued while Nestle products get it.

8. Hilarious that Nestle retain their Royal Warrant considering the crimes they have been involved in ([source](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversies_of_Nestl%C3%A9)). With stealing freshwater, deforestation and climate change denial it makes Charlie boy a total hypocrit on his green credentials… though I guess their slavery and child labour fits like a glove for Andrew.

9. Seriously though; Does that make any real difference? Does taxation change? What is the actual effect?

10. Oh well, that settles the age old love/hate question then doesn’t it!

11. He gets all he wants from all of them for free. Samsung is on the list.
    That’s why there are a load of brewery’s on there!!!

12. Without reading the article I’m guessing that ‘stripping’ means more ‘not renewing’ because most of these big warrants were for Elizabeth II and are only just expiring now. AFAIK these warrants are only really given to companies who produce products actually used by the royal household in question – so it’s just a simple matter of the King not wanting to stock marmite when his mother once did.

13. Charlie boy recognises that Cadburys has declined massively since the American buyout. Good lad.

Comments are closed.