Sara Nathan of the New York Post is Melissa Nathan’s sister, the publicist accused of the smear campaign against Blake Lively. Sara wrote hit pieces on Megan Markle, Angelina Jolie, Olivia Wilde & JLO

Posted by Chile_Momma_38

12 comments

  1. These hate campaigns always felt so inauthentic to me. Like waking up in a different reality where overnight everyone hates person X. I felt that intensely with Amber and Meghan. I’m a certified hater, but even I can’t sustain that kind of vitriol.

  2. I am sure people will be totally normal about this and not go on long diatribes about cosplaying as royals.

  4. I don’t follow royals lolz. My whole childhood was indoctrination about how many people in my country died for us not to have a royal nothing . That being said why people hate on Meghan Markle so much.

    Lolz that woman is Mia. Still hating. Miserable always

  5. Sara Nathan has always posted exclusive scoops from Sussex camp. They use Page six to deny reports. As for Sara Nathan she wrote a disgusting article about Kate going under knife when rumours about Kate were circulating.

    Edit: Meghan fans are wild. The entire point of my comment was to show that this sara person is a general women hater. She writes shit about every woman. And in some cases have gotten exclusive scoops which might or might not have come from their camp (believe it or not) There might not be an agenda in this case as compared to Daily Mail or Sun who clearly has an axe to grind when it comes to M. And all of this doesn’t mean I am denying that Meghan was not on receiving end of hate 🤦🏽‍♀️

  6. The way they rile people up to hate and harass these women, some of whom have been victims of abuse, is vile. Sadly, I know a lot of the people who perpetuate the hate against women are women. Lots of the gossip subs and snark subs are mainly women. Meghan and these other women have done nothing to deserve the massive amounts of hate and harassment.

  7. I mean…. Sara Nathan has also written ‘hit pieces’ on Kate. So I think this is not suggesting necessarily that she is on the payroll of specific people and is working for someone to orchestrate a campaign against those mentioned. But rather it’s a larger story about how the entire tabloid/gossip industry gets their clicks from writing stories bashing women.

  8. Genuine question: Has anyone ever considered the NY Post to be anything but a tabloid?  It’s barely a step above the National Enquirer, an infamous US rag that published Pulitzer-worthy articles like “Bat Boy Born in Appalachian Shack” or “Elvis Seen in Oklahoma Grocery Store”.  Has it ever been considered a source of valid, quality journalism?

  9. Lmao this is the exact reason why so many people hate a woman they’ve never met, and many of us already knew it. I’m sure there will be totally normal responses to the PROOF that there was a hate campaign against Meghan. You guys were told
    how to feel and fell for it.

  10. It’s pretty obvious there’s been a racist and misogynistic smear campaign against Meghan for years now and people fall for it. The multiple unhinged hate subs dedicated to picking apart everything Meghan says or does is proof that it’s still ongoing.

  11. I feel kind of ashamed about this story- because I remember vaguely reading about it on pagesix and seeing the Kjersti story reported (I’ve never watched the clip). Since Blake Lively isn’t a celeb that interests me it barely registered. But I did know that Kjersti posted old stuff, like a decade old interview- and I am beating myself up for my idiocy (no one got hurt from my actions, but I feel like this is not where I should be in life). I should have known that someone that old was being posted because someone else was paying her to do so in order to bury sth else.

    I am also feeling so… sad about the world because these were women hurting a woman for cash. On behalf of a man who was a sexual harasser.

    I mean: Blake is a multimillionaire celebrity with a gorgeous husband. But this bullying by other women happens all the time.

  12. Meghan Markle was the first person I thought of when reading the New York Times article.

    Eviscerating women is a talent of the media, including social media. The information doesn’t need to be untrue but it’s twisting things into the worst possible connotation. It’s taking vague flaws and amplifying them until they take on the equivalency of mass murder. None of these women have done anything worthy of the criticism poured onto them. That’s Meghan Markle and Kate Middleton and Blake Lively and many others.

    I personally don’t have much of an opinion of Blake Lively. I never watched her TV show. I’ve only seen a few of her movies (and have generally liked them.) I was totally unaware of the movie in question. I did however notice a huge uptick in Reddit posts with negative stories about her. To the extent, I was like, “why has everyone suddenly decided to start hating on this person??”

Comments are closed.