United Nations bans staff from using ‘war’ or ‘invasion’ regarding Ukraine

33 comments
  1. Well what the fuck is point of UN, documenting war crimes? Because they aint maintaining no peace or security at the moment… (Atleast it does not seem like UN has done anything useful in the last two weeks).

    And now this is just slap againts the west and agreeing with Kreml propaganda…

    **THIS IS WAR! This is PUTINS war againts Ukraine and it’s people**

    Слава Україні!

    Edit: if there are any legit “UN defenders”, i would really love to hear what good they have done at the moment and maybe someone can prove that i’m wrong.

  2. Don’t say “invasion”, instead say: “ they got lost while going home and ended up in a different country and decided to stay”.

    Is it Colombus day already?

  3. An organisation banding together china, north korea, russia, saudi arabia etc. was always going to be useless. You cant reason with the irrational. Blows my mind how the UN isnt seen as the joke it is.

  4. IMO there is not enough info on these specific guidelines, and the context of their application.

    Everyone here is easely condemning the UN. With the diplomacy in these comments, you wouldn’t be able to keep 2 people at a table.
    Trying to keep all governments at a table is highly complex and difficult. It is ugly like reality.

    I don’t pretend to know but these 2 words could be strategically important for a higher cause.

  5. We did it. War is politically correct now. The world is saved. Useles bunch of decrepit paper pushers.

  6. Why can’t we call things for what they actually are? Why do we have to use edulcorated terms to talk about such things? smh

  7. Ok… That’s it…

    UN just became the League of Nations…

    Time for a new one, third time’s the charm… Right?

Leave a Reply