C’mon man, you cant just add up random aggregates.
Consolidating all three different metrics into a single bar for each state is…confusing. The aggregate of all three really doesn’t mean anything since they’re just different descriptions of the same idea. They’re not really “additive” in nature imo.
It looks professional but the actual story being told by the different metrics is missed by combining them
I’m reporting this for trolling 🤣
Ahh yes, Wyoming & North Dakota. The two states long synonymous as having the wealthiest citizens in the country.
/s
Income per capita isn’t really useful for anything, especially in a society ran by corporations.
Sorted based on the second parameter? That’s just weird
7 comments
Sources:
[https://www.bea.gov/data/income-saving/real-personal-income-states-and-metropolitan-areas](https://www.bea.gov/data/income-saving/real-personal-income-states-and-metropolitan-areas)
[https://apps.bea.gov/itable/?ReqID=70](https://apps.bea.gov/itable/?ReqID=70)
[https://fred.stlouisfed.org/release/tables?eid=257197&rid=110](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/release/tables?eid=257197&rid=110)
C’mon man, you cant just add up random aggregates.
Consolidating all three different metrics into a single bar for each state is…confusing. The aggregate of all three really doesn’t mean anything since they’re just different descriptions of the same idea. They’re not really “additive” in nature imo.
It looks professional but the actual story being told by the different metrics is missed by combining them
I’m reporting this for trolling 🤣
Ahh yes, Wyoming & North Dakota. The two states long synonymous as having the wealthiest citizens in the country.
/s
Income per capita isn’t really useful for anything, especially in a society ran by corporations.
Sorted based on the second parameter? That’s just weird
Comments are closed.