We used data from Cal Fire https://34c031f8-c9fd-4018-8c5a-4159cdff6b0d-cdn-endpoint.azureedge.net/-/media/calfire-website/our-impact/fire-statistics/top-20-destructive-ca-wildfires.pdf?rev=adaab68dd6504600af8a43fc9c811388&hash=566942C29E2764E059D05FE5D13A7142 and GGPLOT 2 to show Devastating insights into the Eaton and Palisades Fires—now among California’s largest. Let’s reflect, support, and build resilience.

Posted by forensiceconomics

9 comments

  2. Seems like a great time to start talking about underground power lines.

  3. I feel that dates would be more effective than, a thing I’m just learning is real, Fire names. Camp Fire sure is unassuming but “PG&E Negligence Fire of 2018” would be better. But that’s just me hating on a naming convention.

  4. People will never understand how devastating the Camp fire was due to it’s distance from Hollywood and lack of celebrity homeowners.

    I feel terrible for those losing homes in Palisade fire, but still know people living out of trailers 6 years after the Camp and North Complex fires. I envision a much quicker recovery for those in Pacific Palisades

  5. I was reading: power line, power line, arson, power line, WITCH!
    🧙

  6. The CAMP (Powerlines) fire was a product of Forensic Economic Services LLC? They should really be investigated for that don’t you think!

  7. Time to nationalize the electricity supply. And the corporate death sentence for these electric companies, starting with PG&E.

  8. Might not be a terrible idea to take better care of the powerlines…

  9. The monetary value of the structures damaged in the palisades fire will be much higher than CAMP. Those structures are worth probably an average of almost 10 million dollars… factor in cars and all the valuables in those home, I’m estimating 50 billion

Comments are closed.