The article fails to explain how a £86 million investment will help secure £1 billion in contracts. The ITER contracts are awarded based on each country contribution. UK will get contracts commensurate with its monetary participation. If UK’s contributions is £1 billion then they already secured £1 billion in contracts.
Seems like good UK news. But how is it relevant for ‘europe’?
Edit: ok geez. Apparently r/europe is home to a lot of very angry/sensitive british people hovering over their keyboards. I’ll unsub and go look elsewhere for interesting news relevant to ‘europe’. You people aren’t exactly winning any friends.
7 comments
The article fails to explain how a £86 million investment will help secure £1 billion in contracts. The ITER contracts are awarded based on each country contribution. UK will get contracts commensurate with its monetary participation. If UK’s contributions is £1 billion then they already secured £1 billion in contracts.
Seems like good UK news. But how is it relevant for ‘europe’?
Edit: ok geez. Apparently r/europe is home to a lot of very angry/sensitive british people hovering over their keyboards. I’ll unsub and go look elsewhere for interesting news relevant to ‘europe’. You people aren’t exactly winning any friends.
[removed]
[removed]
Bunch of negative nancies in the comments tbh
TL;DR: GVT invested/subsidized ITER suppliers.
[deleted]