> Het doel was om uiteindelijk daders in kinderpornozaken op te sporen.
Ah, “het doel heiligt de middelen” fallacy. You don’t want to stop pedos? Are you a pedo perhaps?
I for one don’t give a flying fuck about the use of facial recognition software used by the police when it concerns me but from a general privacy standpoint I understand why it’s bad.
Isn’t that kind of software illegal in Belgium? Would that make any evidence obtained in this way count as illegitimately obtained and thus not hold up in court anyway?
I, for one, am glad to see some kind of intelligence in our police force.
3 comments
> Het doel was om uiteindelijk daders in kinderpornozaken op te sporen.
Ah, “het doel heiligt de middelen” fallacy. You don’t want to stop pedos? Are you a pedo perhaps?
I for one don’t give a flying fuck about the use of facial recognition software used by the police when it concerns me but from a general privacy standpoint I understand why it’s bad.
Isn’t that kind of software illegal in Belgium? Would that make any evidence obtained in this way count as illegitimately obtained and thus not hold up in court anyway?
I, for one, am glad to see some kind of intelligence in our police force.
^(*hides from bittersteel*)