Judge Cannon OKs release of special counsel’s report into Trump and election subversion

https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/13/politics/special-counsel-trump-january-6-report-judge-cannon/index.html

47 comments

  3. Ooh… Trump’s gonna see this as a betrayal. All of her favors are right out the window and she’s on the coffee girl he barely knows list for sure now.

  5. “…after being told she couldn’t prevent it by a higher court”. There I fixed it

  6. She must’ve been told that Justice Alito was not retiring so she won’t be picked for SCOTUS.

  7. This sad excuse for a judge has been protecting Trump every step of the way. What does she know? The report will be so redacted that it won’t make any difference?

  8. I hope the report is titled **Donald Trump: Oops, All Felonies**

  9. The one she had no jurisdiction over.

    Judge Cannon also ruled that Canada that they can enjoy their territorial sovereignty for the time being.

    This after noon, Cannon takes up the question of whether water is wet and if she will allow it to continue to be so.

  10. Fairly sure her approval wasn’t needed now, since the appeals court struck her decision down.

  11. Trump made our system of laws a joke and Merrick Garland let him do it.

  13. More documentation of how unfit for any elective the guy is…Great.

    #FFOTUS

  14. She had no choice. This is why I hate journalist at this point. She never had the power to stop it but yet these journalists are pretending she not only had the power but now she is the one saying it’s okay to release it now.

  15. I have very unkind thoughts about her, unsuited to Reddit. God I would love to express them to her in person.

  17. Oh gee did she say it was ok? Apparently the entirety of the us government hinges on this loons word. Fuck her. Release it whether she likes it or not. It is OUR REPORT.

  18. “Cartoonish Trump sycophant stops trying to block something they never had any business blocking.” Ok, call it the tiniest of wins for the rule of law. How much do they rely on simply having no one to stand up to them?

  19. Judge Cannon was overruled by a higher court and forced to withdrawal her order on blocking the report….SHE DID’T OK ANYTHING!

    Welcome to CNN trying to appease Trump for the next 4 years. 

  20. That’s nice of her, considering she can’t do that shit.

  21. The bitch has/had no say in whether or not it was released. FFS

  23. I thought she was overseeing the documents case, not the election subversion. Why does she get to weigh in on that?

  24. Lemme guess, it’s going to go to the supreme court and they’ll just protect Trump yet again?

    Until it’s released, I’m not holding my breath.

  25. Only because the treasonous bitch was ordered to by the Appeals court

  26. she actually did something right for a change? was not on my bingo card

  27. Lol no she didn’t. The Attorney General told her it *was* going to be released.

  28. Oh really? Is it ok with you, Aileen? You pathetic excuse for a human—er, judge.

  29. Who rights these ridiculously misleading headlines? And why propagate them?

  32. No she didn’t she got told she has no jurisdiction over whether it was or not and to sit down and shut up

  33. Just need one PDF on one flash drive to make it to the offices of a major news agency. The people need to know.

  34. Can someone please tell me why any of this Cannon crap is even at issue? DOJ answers to POTUS. Joe need only order Garland to send him the report, and release said report. End of story.

  35. she only did what was commanded of her by the higher appeals court authority, let’s not try to whitewash to make it seem like she’s actually doing her job properly

  36. How can she rule on this case when it wasn’t hers?

  37. Why does she even matter when it comes to this stuff

  38. Can we stop posting articles with intentionally incorrect or misleading headlines, please? Cannon didn’t do shit here, she was overruled.

  39. She didn’t “okay” anything. She never had the authority to block the report in the first place. It’s yet another judicial overstep/misstep on her part and further proves she should have never been assigned to Trumps case.

  40. The classified docs report is more important. Smith says he knows WHY Trump took them and WHAT he was planning to do with them.

    They need to leak that report before Trump is inaugurated.

  41. She “Oks” what? She didn’t have authority to prevent its release. Higher courts told her stfu already.

  42. They’re delaying until the next admin can release a PR statement ahead of the full release. 

    Come the fuck on, Biden. If you don’t have the balls to release it, at least release your own PR statement. Here, I have a draft for you. 

    “Trump was and is guilty as fuck. If this were the 1950s we’d have already strapped his ass into an electric chair and flipped the switch.” 

  43. Finally, Eileen

    No actually she’s still just a Trump pawn

  44. Couldn’t Biden just release all the info of the case on his way out of office?

  45. So the judge that has zero jurisdiction over this says its OK to release it now?

  46. >However, Cannon scheduled a court hearing later this week on **Attorney General Merrick Garland’s** plan to share with some lawmakers the part of Smith’s report dealing with the classified documents probe. In the meantime, she is continuing to halt the department from disclosing that aspect of the report to anyone outside of the agency.

    Reason not to get too excited bolded for your convenience.

  47. Are there no other pictures of her in existence? All you ever see is this one picture. I men there surely must be some pics of her inflating Donald Trump. Additionally I never realized she is in charge of the DOJ apparently. Blocking the release of one case she is no longer a part of, and blocking the release of another case she was never a part of.

Comments are closed.