Like his previous visit to the UK, he has again turned down to stay at Buckingham Palace.
Harry is exhausting.
He has plenty of money to hire his own security.
Need to get more context why the limited security is being offered. Because it is actually interesting that he’s being given limited police security–despite losing his case for security. I’m like, UK Police, make up your mind if you want to protect your exiled prince or not, or you’re willing to do so on a case-to-case basis. Don’t use him as the convenient bad guy for increasing your costs if you’re willing to give him
some protection.
About the Buckingham Palace info that he’s refused the stay there, I don’t even know if Harry asked for a place to stay there in the first place. Some people like to say they offered things on paper so they can have an excuse to reject you. And make you look ungrateful.
But man, if this is the official leak from BP, Charles is cold to his own son.
The haters can spit feathers all they want but the son of a king should be offered armed protection the same way the child of any head of state would be. You’re delusional if you think he is not at risk of serious harm. And no he doesn’t have to stay at Buckingham palace either if he doesn’t want to.
And Charles himself doesn’t stay at Buckingham palace supposedly because it’s cold and draughty
I’m not a fan of Harry’s. At all.
But, I think the children of the head of state (the monarch) and the children of the monarch’s heir (so William’s kids) should all have government security, even if they’re not “working royals.”
Unless that person moves away from the UK, I don’t think the gov should be expected to provide security to someone that decided to live in another country.
The gov is going to look ridiculous and weak if jihadis decided to chop Harry’s head off one day. And no telling them to pay for it doesn’t work because you can’t pay for armed security in the UK, nor can you privately pay Scotland guard for theirs.
What a ridiculous “poll.” The Mirror is making it sound as if it’s a money issue & trying to get their readers riled up over “paying for Harry’s security.” But he HAS offered to pay for it himself, IIRC.
Gray rock King.
As a British person, he shouldn’t come back. He made his choice to leave, so he should leave us alone!
Jeez even Joe Bidens grandchildren get secret service agents. I feel like they are blatantly letting Harry risk his life.
[deleted]
The vitriol people have for him and his wife is concerning. Low level working royals get protection, Harry is definitely at high risk. I hope he pays for private security as well.
he will be fine
They aren’t going to be satisfied until there is a major incident involving Harry, notwithstanding that it will make them all look grossly negligent.
Are we all reading the same article? He’s still being offered armed police officer protection, albeit “limited” …meaning he won’t have a whole army escorting him. That feels like a suitable amount of security, given that he is 5th in line… that’s a lot of well guarded people needing to die… 4 of them young and in good health.
This article feels like rage bait tbh
I’m not from the UK or a commonwealth country, so, you know, not my business in any way, but I firmly believe that every member of the royal family (up to a certain point, obviously) should have security paid for by the government. These people are thrust into the public eye the second they are born and are used as tabloid fodder to entertain/distract the masses all their lives, because they were born into a family that the people in charge insist should still be figureheads for the state. They are permanent security risks through no fault of their own and unless the monarchy is abolished, public funds should be used to help mitigate that risk.
I’d like to see Andrew living out of a cardboard box, but I think even that POS should get security. People are fucking crazy.
17 comments
https://preview.redd.it/4a5g5y6466de1.png?width=1080&format=png&auto=webp&s=bbc687c4f3d04363a951648d99d64f72cde12d4d
Like his previous visit to the UK, he has again turned down to stay at Buckingham Palace.
Harry is exhausting.
He has plenty of money to hire his own security.
Need to get more context why the limited security is being offered. Because it is actually interesting that he’s being given limited police security–despite losing his case for security. I’m like, UK Police, make up your mind if you want to protect your exiled prince or not, or you’re willing to do so on a case-to-case basis. Don’t use him as the convenient bad guy for increasing your costs if you’re willing to give him
some protection.
About the Buckingham Palace info that he’s refused the stay there, I don’t even know if Harry asked for a place to stay there in the first place. Some people like to say they offered things on paper so they can have an excuse to reject you. And make you look ungrateful.
But man, if this is the official leak from BP, Charles is cold to his own son.
The haters can spit feathers all they want but the son of a king should be offered armed protection the same way the child of any head of state would be. You’re delusional if you think he is not at risk of serious harm. And no he doesn’t have to stay at Buckingham palace either if he doesn’t want to.
And Charles himself doesn’t stay at Buckingham palace supposedly because it’s cold and draughty
I’m not a fan of Harry’s. At all.
But, I think the children of the head of state (the monarch) and the children of the monarch’s heir (so William’s kids) should all have government security, even if they’re not “working royals.”
Unless that person moves away from the UK, I don’t think the gov should be expected to provide security to someone that decided to live in another country.
The gov is going to look ridiculous and weak if jihadis decided to chop Harry’s head off one day. And no telling them to pay for it doesn’t work because you can’t pay for armed security in the UK, nor can you privately pay Scotland guard for theirs.
What a ridiculous “poll.” The Mirror is making it sound as if it’s a money issue & trying to get their readers riled up over “paying for Harry’s security.” But he HAS offered to pay for it himself, IIRC.
Gray rock King.
As a British person, he shouldn’t come back. He made his choice to leave, so he should leave us alone!
Jeez even Joe Bidens grandchildren get secret service agents. I feel like they are blatantly letting Harry risk his life.
[deleted]
The vitriol people have for him and his wife is concerning. Low level working royals get protection, Harry is definitely at high risk. I hope he pays for private security as well.
he will be fine
They aren’t going to be satisfied until there is a major incident involving Harry, notwithstanding that it will make them all look grossly negligent.
Are we all reading the same article? He’s still being offered armed police officer protection, albeit “limited” …meaning he won’t have a whole army escorting him. That feels like a suitable amount of security, given that he is 5th in line… that’s a lot of well guarded people needing to die… 4 of them young and in good health.
This article feels like rage bait tbh
I’m not from the UK or a commonwealth country, so, you know, not my business in any way, but I firmly believe that every member of the royal family (up to a certain point, obviously) should have security paid for by the government. These people are thrust into the public eye the second they are born and are used as tabloid fodder to entertain/distract the masses all their lives, because they were born into a family that the people in charge insist should still be figureheads for the state. They are permanent security risks through no fault of their own and unless the monarchy is abolished, public funds should be used to help mitigate that risk.
I’d like to see Andrew living out of a cardboard box, but I think even that POS should get security. People are fucking crazy.
Comments are closed.