I find it astonishing that the bureaucracy only does its administrative (seemingly not engineering) paperwork after the pipeline is already built, and even then it’ll take months.
> “The German regulator has until early January to certify the pipeline but may make its decision earlier. Once it has made its recommendation, it goes to the European Commission, which has another two months to respond”.
Of course it doesn’t. Nord stream 1 didn’t. Blue stream didn’t. Turkstream didn’t. What makes another pipeline any different? Some of you may remember the Baltic and Polish objections to Nord stream 1 around 2010. People even forget it exist now as all doom and gloom never happened.
well to fair, it does not pose any threat, in fact it offers more energy security.
You know because of the multi billions spent on Reverse flow so that any and all imports of gas can be spread across the EU.
5 comments
I’ve got a bridge to sell you.
Oh well if Germany and Russia says so…
I find it astonishing that the bureaucracy only does its administrative (seemingly not engineering) paperwork after the pipeline is already built, and even then it’ll take months.
> “The German regulator has until early January to certify the pipeline but may make its decision earlier. Once it has made its recommendation, it goes to the European Commission, which has another two months to respond”.
Of course it doesn’t. Nord stream 1 didn’t. Blue stream didn’t. Turkstream didn’t. What makes another pipeline any different? Some of you may remember the Baltic and Polish objections to Nord stream 1 around 2010. People even forget it exist now as all doom and gloom never happened.
well to fair, it does not pose any threat, in fact it offers more energy security.
You know because of the multi billions spent on Reverse flow so that any and all imports of gas can be spread across the EU.