Change, C. & SYR Synthesis Report–URL: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/report. IPCC, AR6 Longer Report. (2023).
Laborde, D., Mamun, A., Martin, W., Piñeiro, V. & Vos, R. Agricultural subsidies and global greenhouse gas emissions. Nat. Commun. 12, 2601 (2021).
Snyder, C. S., Bruulsema, T. W., Jensen, T. L. & Fixen, P. E. Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 133, 247–266 (2009).
Farooqi, Z. U. R. et al. Greenhouse gas emissions, carbon stocks and wheat productivity following biochar, compost and vermicompost amendments: comparison of non-saline and salt-affected soils. Sci. Rep. 14, 7752 (2024).
Berhanu, Y. et al. Nitrous oxide and methane emissions from coffee agroforestry systems with different intensities of canopy closure. Sci. Total Environ. 876, 162821 (2023).
Huang, T. et al. Effect on greenhouse gas emissions (CH4 and N2O) of straw mulching or its incorporation in farmland ecosystems in China. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 46, 223–232 (2024).
Cherian, S., Ryu, S. B. & Cornish, K. Natural rubber biosynthesis in plants, the rubber transferase complex, and metabolic engineering progress and prospects. Plant. Biotechnol. J. 17, 2041–2061 (2019).
Warren-Thomas, E. M. et al. Protecting tropical forests from the rapid expansion of rubber using carbon payments. Nat. Commun. 9, 911 (2018).
Lam, S. K. et al. Mitigating soil greenhouse-gas emissions from land‐use change in tropical peatlands. Front. Ecol. Environ. 20, 352–360 (2022).
Lang, R. et al. Mechanism of methane uptake in profiles of tropical soils converted from forest to rubber plantations. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 145, 107796 (2020).
Hassler, E. et al. Soil fertility controls soil-atmosphere carbon dioxide and methane fluxes in a tropical landscape converted from lowland forest to rubber and oil palm plantations. Biogeosciences 12, 5831–5852 (2015).
Umami, I. M., Kamarudin, K. N. & ABE, S. S. Does soil fertility decline under smallholder rubber farming? The case of a west sumatran lowland in Indonesia. Jpn Agric. Res. Q. 53, 279–287 (2019).
Vrignon-Brenas, S. et al. Nutrient management of immature rubber plantations. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 39, 1–21 (2019).
Lin, S., Wu, R., Yang, F., Wang, J. & Wu, W. Spatial trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services within a global biodiversity hotspot. Ecol. Indic. 84, 371–381 (2018).
Schroth, G., Läderach, P., Cuero, B., Neilson, D. S., Bunn, C. & J. & Winner or loser of climate change? A modeling study of current and future climatic suitability of Arabica coffee in Indonesia. Reg. Environ. Change. 15, 1473–1482 (2015).
Jessy, M., Shankar Meti, S. M. & Nair, N. A cropping system for reduction of gestation period and enhanced yield of rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis). Rubber Sci. 26, 210–216 (2013).
van Noordwijk, M., Tata, H. L., Xu, J., Dewi, S. & Minang, P. A. Segregate or integrate for multifunctionality and sustained change through rubber-based agroforestry in Indonesia and China. Agroforestry-the Future Global land. use. 9, 69–104 (2012).
The food and agriculture organization corporate statistical database. (2022). https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, (accessed on 30 April 2024).
Qi, D. et al. Integrative cultivation pattern, distribution, yield and potential benefit of rubber based agroforestry system in China. Ind. Crop Prod. 220, 119228 (2024).
Xu, W. et al. Rubber-based agroforestry ecosystems enhance soil enzyme activity but exacerbate microbial nutrient limitations. Forests 15, 1827 (2024).
Zhou, L. et al. in Proceedings of CRRI and IRRDB International Rubber Conference. Siem Reap. Cambodia. 29–34 (2016).
Rodrigo, V., Silva, T. & Munasinghe, E. Improving the spatial arrangement of planting rubber (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.) For long-term intercropping. Field Crops Res. 89, 327–335 (2004).
Tetteh, E. N. et al. Plantain-tree rubber intercropping systems improved productivity in the tropical humid zone of Ghana, West Africa. Int. J. Agron. 3240686 (2021). (2021).
Panklang, P. et al. Rubber, rubber and rubber: how 75 years of successive rubber plantation rotations affect topsoil quality? Land. Degrad. Dev. 33, 1159–1169 (2022).
Li, X. A. et al. Enhancement of soil carbon and nitrogen stocks by abiotic and microbial pathways in three rubber-based agroforestry systems in Southwest China. Land. Degrad. Dev. 31, 2507–2515 (2020).
Jong, Y. W. et al. Expected carbon emissions from a rubber plantation in Central Africa. Ecol. Manag. 480, 118668 (2021).
Yang, S. et al. Patterns and drivers of greenhouse gas emissions in a tropical rubber plantation from Hainan, Danzhou. Atmosphere 15, 1245 (2024).
Toriyama, J. et al. Effects of forest conversion to rubber plantation and of replanting rubber trees on soil organic carbon pools in a tropical moist climate zone. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 323, 107699 (2022).
Petsri, S., Chidthaisong, A., Pumijumnong, N. & Wachrinrat, C. Greenhouse gas emissions and carbon stock changes in rubber tree plantations in Thailand from 1990 to 2004. J. Clean. Prod. 52, 61–70 (2013).
Zhou, W. et al. Drivers of difference in CO2 and CH4 emissions between rubber plantation and tropical rainforest soils. Agric. Meteorol. 304, 108391 (2021).
Zhou, W. J. et al. The effects of nitrogen fertilization on N2O emissions from a rubber plantation. Sci. Rep. 6, 28230 (2016).
Ishizuka, S. et al. Effects of conversion from leguminous acacia to non-leguminous eucalyptus on soil N2O emissions in tropical monoculture plantations. Ecol. Manag. 481, 118702 (2021).
Kim, D. G., Kirschbaum, M. U. & Beedy, T. L. Carbon sequestration and net emissions of CH4 and N2O under agroforestry: synthesizing available data and suggestions for future studies. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 226, 65–78 (2016).
Ajit et al. Quantification of carbon stocks and sequestration potential through existing agroforestry systems in the hilly Kupwara district of Kashmir valley in India. Curr. Sci. 782–785 (2017). (2017).
Veres, Z. et al. Soil extracellular enzyme activities are sensitive indicators of detrital inputs and carbon availability. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 92, 18–23 (2015).
Luo, L., Meng, H. & Gu, J. D. Microbial extracellular enzymes in biogeochemical cycling of ecosystems. J. Environ. Manage. 197, 539–549 (2017).
Hauggaard-Nielsen, H. & Jensen, E. S. Facilitative root interactions in intercrops. Root physiology: From gene to function, 237–250 (2005). (2005).
Shah, A. et al. Impact of soil moisture regimes on greenhouse gas emissions, soil microbial biomass, and enzymatic activity in long-term fertilized paddy soil. Environ. Sci. Eur. 36, 120 (2024).
Qi, D. et al. Can intercropping with native trees enhance structural stability in young rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) agroforestry system? Eur. J. Agron. 130, 126353 (2021).
Xian, Y. et al. Determining suitable sampling Times for Soil CO2 and N2O emissions helps to accurately evaluate the ability of Rubber-based Agroforestry systems to cope with climate stress. Forests 15, 950 (2024).
Huang, J. et al. An improved double-row rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) plantation system increases land use efficiency by allowing intercropping with yam bean, common bean, soybean, peanut, and coffee: a 17-year case study on Hainan Island, China. J. Clean. Prod. 263, 121493 (2020).
Nelson, D. W. & Sommers, L. E. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Methods soil. Analysis: Part. 2 Chem. Microbiol. Prop. 9, 539–579 (1982).
Lu, R. Analytical methods of soil agrochemistry. China Agricultural Sci. Technol. Press. Beijing, 85–96 (1999).
Wu, L. et al. Nitrous oxide emissions in response to straw incorporation is regulated by historical fertilization. Environ. Pollut. 266, 115292 (2020).
DeForest, J. L. The influence of time, storage temperature, and substrate age on potential soil enzyme activity in acidic forest soils using MUB-linked substrates and L-DOPA. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 41, 1180–1186 (2009).
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Summary for policymakers. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Stocker T.F et al.). Cambridge, England and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press (2013).
Sokol, N. W., Kuebbing, S. E., Karlsen-Ayala, E. & Bradford, M. A. Evidence for the primacy of living root inputs, not root or shoot litter, in forming soil organic carbon. New. Phytol. 221, 233–246 (2019).
Saikia, R., Sharma, S., Thind, H. & Sidhu, H. Temporal changes in biochemical indicators of soil quality in response to tillage, crop residue and green manure management in a rice-wheat system. Ecol. Indic. 103, 383–394 (2019).
Buyer, J. S., Baligar, V. C. & He, Z. Arévalo-Gardini, E. Soil microbial communities under cacao agroforestry and cover crop systems in Peru. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 120, 273–280 (2017).
Maurya, B., Dhyani, V. S. P. & Kashyap, S. Impact of altitudes on soil characteristics and enzymatic activities in forest and fallow lands of Almora district of central Himalaya. Octa J. Environ. Res. 2, 1–9 (2014).
Yu, P., Liu, S., Han, K., Guan, S. & Zhou, D. Conversion of cropland to forage land and grassland increases soil labile carbon and enzyme activities in northeastern China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 245, 83–91 (2017).
Mortimer, R., Saj, S. & David, C. Supporting and regulating ecosystem services in cacao agroforestry systems. Agrofor. Syst. 92, 1639–1657 (2018).
Tang, X. et al. Intercropping legumes and cereals increases phosphorus use efficiency; a meta-analysis. Plant. Soil. 460, 89–104 (2021).
Mudare, S. et al. Yield and fertilizer benefits of maize/grain legume intercropping in China and Africa: a meta-analysis. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 42, 81 (2022).
Cardinael, R., Mao, Z., Chenu, C. & Hinsinger, P. Belowground functioning of agroforestry systems: recent advances and perspectives. Plant. Soil. 453, 1–13 (2020).
Kemmitt, S. J., Wright, D., Goulding, K. W. & Jones, D. L. pH regulation of carbon and nitrogen dynamics in two agricultural soils. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 38, 898–911 (2006).
Clivot, H. et al. Early effects of temperate agroforestry practices on soil organic matter and microbial enzyme activity. Plant. Soil. 453, 189–207 (2020).
Ma, Y. H., Fu, S. L., Zhang, X. P., Zhao, K. & Chen, H. Y. Intercropping improves soil nutrient availability, soil enzyme activity and tea quantity and quality. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 119, 171–178 (2017).
Bresciani, L., Freitas, C. C. G., do Rêgo Barros, F. M., Andreote, F. D. & Dini-Andreote, F. Partitioning the effects of coffee-Urochloa intercropping on soil microbial properties at a centimeter-scale. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 195, 105264 (2024).
Adetunji, A. T., Lewu, F. B., Mulidzi, R. & Ncube, B. The biological activities of β-glucosidase, phosphatase and urease as soil quality indicators: a review. J. Soil. Sci. Plant. Nutr. 17, 794–807 (2017).
Jian, S. et al. Soil extracellular enzyme activities, soil carbon and nitrogen storage under nitrogen fertilization: a meta-analysis. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 101, 32–43 (2016).
Feng, C. et al. Soil enzyme activities increase following restoration of degraded subtropical forests. Geoderma 351, 180–187 (2019).
Lemanowicz, J. et al. The effect of enzyme activity on carbon sequestration and the cycle of available macro-(P, K, mg) and microelements (Zn, Cu) in Phaeozems. Agric 13, 172 (2023).
Li, G. et al. Response of soil organic carbon fractions to legume incorporation into cropping system and the factors affecting it: a global meta-analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 342, 108231 (2023).
Kuzyakov, Y. Sources of CO2 efflux from soil and review of partitioning methods. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 38, 425–448 (2006).
Janssens, I. A. et al. Productivity overshadows temperature in determining soil and ecosystem respiration across European forests. Glob Change Biol. 7, 269–278 (2001).
Kan, Z. R. et al. Soil organic carbon regulates CH4 production through methanogenic evenness and available phosphorus under different straw managements. J. Environ. Manage. 328, 116990 (2023).
Peichl, M., Arain, M. A., Ullah, S. & Moore, T. R. Carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide exchanges in an age-sequence of temperate pine forests. Glob Change Biol. 16, 2198–2212 (2010).
Mangalassery, S., Sjögersten, S., Sparkes, D., Sturrock, C. & Mooney, S. The effect of soil aggregate size on pore structure and its consequence on emission of greenhouse gases. Soil. Till Res. 132, 39–46 (2013).
Zhang, M. et al. Intercropping with BNI-sorghum benefits neighbouring maize productivity and mitigates soil nitrification and N2O emission. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 352, 108510 (2023).
Kong, D. et al. Low N2O emissions from wheat in a wheat-rice double cropping system due to manure substitution are associated with changes in the abundance of functional microbes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 311, 107318 (2021).
Li, X. F. et al. Long-term increased grain yield and soil fertility from intercropping. Nat. Sustain. 4, 943–950 (2021).
Wang, Y. et al. Soil pH as the chief modifier for regional nitrous oxide emissions: new evidence and implications for global estimates and mitigation. Glob Change Biol. 24, e617–e626 (2018).
Shaaban, M. et al. Mitigation of N2O emissions from urine treated acidic soils by liming. Environ. Pollut. 255, 113237 (2019).
Lv, J. et al. Mitigation of reactive nitrogen loss from arable soils through microbial inoculant application: a meta-analysis. Soil. Till Res. 235, 105883 (2024).