*”Someone fetch the flame thrower, The Thing’s gotten in to the dogs again!”*
Removed the location to avoid Doxxing myself!
What a perfectly normal and geometrically logical fence gate.
yeah, those dogs have a normal amount of legs
Isn’t theft a sin?
“Parishes Magazine” sounds like those guest publications they have on Have I Got News For You.
Evening Reverand, there is a six legged dog about.
Interesting architectural decision to build a door leading out from the bungalow’s dormer. I often enjoy starting my day by getting out of bed, opening the door, and falling down a few metres into the front garden.
You have to fly through that ring, then the next one that appears, then the next one, etc. You’ll get a jiggy at the end!
Someone really looked at this and thought ‘yup perfect’ lol
Finally, the church’s image resizing problems are over.
Instead of doing “spot the difference” with kids we should get them playing “spot the AI flaws”.
Ehh, what in the world happened to the first dog?
There was a streamer recently who admitted being furious at a church for using standard Youtube to play the requested songs at his gran’s funeral, they had to listen to ads from Tony at Tile It All multiple times.
This so sad.
If they *don’t* want to carefully design a cover each month (fair enough) why not open it to local residents to send in covers or something?
I know it’s an amusing minor thing….I laugh at first and then just feel sad.
What monster snapped the robins legs off?
Why do you care?
I still don’t understand how AI can do a decent job at a snowy Tudor cottage, but fail to get the right number of legs on a dog.
I can even forgive that middle “sheep headed” dog because it would be hard to articulate what exactly looks wrong about it, but surely: legs=4 is a basic check for a dog…
Maybe it’s a “what’s wrong with the photo”
Royston Vasey Parishes?
the local builders who rebuilt the church corner werent actual builders but they were cheap
Can we ban the ‘spotted AI’ posts under rule 7.
I think the people who make parish magazines (older generation) would not be able to identify AI art at a glance. I suspect this was a photo found on facebook or somewhere and used for this instead of being generated specifically for this.
Nice flag pole!
England has fallen
I hate it.
I don’t have a problem with that. The alternative would’ve had to of been an unpaid volunteer who did the illustration, or a Creative Commons licences pic off the internet. These publications are free and therefore have no budget. Probably one of the few instances where AI isn’t taking someone’s job.
It’s such a weird feeling looking at these.
At a glance, your brain parses everything as perfectly normal. Then you actually look at it and then you wtf.
It’s incredible what you can get away with if it’s only required to be glanced at.
A floating flagpole above the church? Satan must be afoot….
Those font choices tell me all I need to know about the person making this cover
The issue is that the image looks bad, not that AI is used. Being against AI is like being against airplanes or the internet.
Slightly off topic, but does anyone know how to stop receiving these parish magazine things.
Is there a Nuclear plant somewhere near this parish ?
I think the dogs stole the legs off the robins.
I reckon it they didn’t even know it was AI. Half of Google image results are AI nowadays for certain things.
The longer you look at this picture the weirder it gets.
The shadows in random places, the inexplicably flying objects, the evolution from dog to panther to (chicken? Crouching monkey?), the legless robins in the foreground, one of which appears pressed to the invisible glass of our view, so in the shadow of the castle / church / optical illusion where presumably if you enter the side building from the incorrect entrance you get to find out why the church roof is the only surface not covered in snow, and you’d better hope it’s just that they’re growing weed, and that the correct entrance is the one creeping slowly down towards the viewer.
Also, minor detail, but I don’t understand why all the windows are picked out in white. I don’t think that’s a thing.
35 comments
My caption for it is:
*”Someone fetch the flame thrower, The Thing’s gotten in to the dogs again!”*
Removed the location to avoid Doxxing myself!
What a perfectly normal and geometrically logical fence gate.
yeah, those dogs have a normal amount of legs
Isn’t theft a sin?
“Parishes Magazine” sounds like those guest publications they have on Have I Got News For You.
Evening Reverand, there is a six legged dog about.
Interesting architectural decision to build a door leading out from the bungalow’s dormer. I often enjoy starting my day by getting out of bed, opening the door, and falling down a few metres into the front garden.
You have to fly through that ring, then the next one that appears, then the next one, etc. You’ll get a jiggy at the end!
Someone really looked at this and thought ‘yup perfect’ lol
Finally, the church’s image resizing problems are over.
Instead of doing “spot the difference” with kids we should get them playing “spot the AI flaws”.
Ehh, what in the world happened to the first dog?
There was a streamer recently who admitted being furious at a church for using standard Youtube to play the requested songs at his gran’s funeral, they had to listen to ads from Tony at Tile It All multiple times.
This so sad.
If they *don’t* want to carefully design a cover each month (fair enough) why not open it to local residents to send in covers or something?
I know it’s an amusing minor thing….I laugh at first and then just feel sad.
What monster snapped the robins legs off?
Why do you care?
I still don’t understand how AI can do a decent job at a snowy Tudor cottage, but fail to get the right number of legs on a dog.
I can even forgive that middle “sheep headed” dog because it would be hard to articulate what exactly looks wrong about it, but surely: legs=4 is a basic check for a dog…
Maybe it’s a “what’s wrong with the photo”
Royston Vasey Parishes?
the local builders who rebuilt the church corner werent actual builders but they were cheap
Can we ban the ‘spotted AI’ posts under rule 7.
I think the people who make parish magazines (older generation) would not be able to identify AI art at a glance. I suspect this was a photo found on facebook or somewhere and used for this instead of being generated specifically for this.
Nice flag pole!
England has fallen
I hate it.
I don’t have a problem with that. The alternative would’ve had to of been an unpaid volunteer who did the illustration, or a Creative Commons licences pic off the internet. These publications are free and therefore have no budget. Probably one of the few instances where AI isn’t taking someone’s job.
It’s such a weird feeling looking at these.
At a glance, your brain parses everything as perfectly normal. Then you actually look at it and then you wtf.
It’s incredible what you can get away with if it’s only required to be glanced at.
A floating flagpole above the church? Satan must be afoot….
Those font choices tell me all I need to know about the person making this cover
The issue is that the image looks bad, not that AI is used. Being against AI is like being against airplanes or the internet.
Slightly off topic, but does anyone know how to stop receiving these parish magazine things.
Is there a Nuclear plant somewhere near this parish ?
I think the dogs stole the legs off the robins.
I reckon it they didn’t even know it was AI. Half of Google image results are AI nowadays for certain things.
The longer you look at this picture the weirder it gets.
The shadows in random places, the inexplicably flying objects, the evolution from dog to panther to (chicken? Crouching monkey?), the legless robins in the foreground, one of which appears pressed to the invisible glass of our view, so in the shadow of the castle / church / optical illusion where presumably if you enter the side building from the incorrect entrance you get to find out why the church roof is the only surface not covered in snow, and you’d better hope it’s just that they’re growing weed, and that the correct entrance is the one creeping slowly down towards the viewer.
Also, minor detail, but I don’t understand why all the windows are picked out in white. I don’t think that’s a thing.
Comments are closed.