Sources would give this a modicum of credibility. AI tends to make stuff up.
Why are all these confidence intervals about the same lengths. Seems fishy or use of very small sample data.
So under Community Engagement, global engagement drives altruism down? That seems odd.
This was posted before. OP asked an LLM to create a 37-year-old woman and ask her these questions. At least there was disclosure (sort of) that the data was AI-generated this time.
LLMs cannot and should not be used for this purpose.
While this sub allows simulated data, it’s not clear to me this is something that can be simulated using AI tools.
11 comments
What was the process here? Did you just ask an AI whether these factors contributed and compile the results?
I’m gonna need to see raw data and/or methodology on this one.
Source: [https://smith.langchain.com/public/fbc73804-ace8-42ae-b71c-67946b5996aa/r](https://smith.langchain.com/public/fbc73804-ace8-42ae-b71c-67946b5996aa/r)
Tool: [https://app.subconscious.ai/insights/f0ec0c52-3883-44a2-9928-a16d58240941](https://app.subconscious.ai/insights/f0ec0c52-3883-44a2-9928-a16d58240941)
Sources would give this a modicum of credibility. AI tends to make stuff up.
Why are all these confidence intervals about the same lengths. Seems fishy or use of very small sample data.
So under Community Engagement, global engagement drives altruism down? That seems odd.
This was posted before. OP asked an LLM to create a 37-year-old woman and ask her these questions. At least there was disclosure (sort of) that the data was AI-generated this time.
LLMs cannot and should not be used for this purpose.
While this sub allows simulated data, it’s not clear to me this is something that can be simulated using AI tools.
In a nutshell: don’t buy motivational posters
Peer Pressure in there anywhere ?
or would that then be False Altruism …
Comments are closed.