Vienas personas mājsaimniecība, kas strādā par minimālo algu 40h/ned, ir oficiāli zem nabadzības sliekšņa, jo minimālās bruto nekādi nesanāk tie 641e pēc nodokļiem.
As a Turkish who live in Latvia, I can say it is piece of shit. You can not maintain one month with minimum salary in Turkey. Price is almost same, then also actually in Turkey meat is expensive than Latvia. Rental is same, but mortgage is expensive than Latvia again. If you want to take a look price about rental, house and car prices you can visit sahibinden.com
This diagram defines poverty line as “50% of the median disposable income in the country.” It does not indicate how much income you need to survive.
This indicates that most Turks have very low disposable income (which is true due to hyperinflation) so you don’t need many hours of minimum wage to exceed the median.
Americans have high disposable income, so you need to work a lot to exceed the median.
And America varies a lot.
Maybe I am living in my own bubble, but person who hasnt just started first job , shoudnt rely on minimum wage. Its minimums i.e there is no more less qualified job down the line than this one, once you get expirience even if its in that same job, person should earn more. Thus minimum wage statistics in their core are extremely unreliable metric. Also if we raise that one, then whole slew of issues on high end jobs that people will think overpaid will get more since some are based on minimum wage, while regular person wouldnt be affected that much,
Are social benefits crap here, specially compared to some more developed countries? Probably , but this statistic seems nonsensical for slew of reasons (it makes sense when operates with those numbers but those numbers arent that relevant for actual picture). Also why US is so low on chart- because they pretty much dont have minimum wage that would remotely correlate with reality , not to mention any US based statistic is nonsense to begin with since US is bigger than EU , but statistics view it as monolith entity like is its for California or Nebraska? Would be same saying EU has this and that and then take Denmark as benchmark, and then extrapolate that people in Romania have same standards.
Need to increase defence budget to 5%, solves problems 👌
Another nonsense Reddit bs.
Japan “escaping poverty” in just 14 hours a week? Yeah, right, like Tokyo’s rent’s that cheap on minimum wage! And the U.S. at 80 hours? That’s basically two full-time jobs just to scrape by—sounds like someone’s calculator partied too hard. Sure, it’s sourced from the OECD, but without the full breakdown, these numbers smell fishy as hell. Minimum wages, benefits, and living costs vary way too much for this to be straight-up truth—looks like Reddit’s serving up half-baked data again.
Frim which arse these figures are pulled out?
Pirmais ko tikko izmācījies cilvēks var darīt ir iestāties darbā un gulēt parkā uz beņķa jo ja vēlies kur dzīvot, tev paprasīs iemaksāt vismaz 300€ depozītu, pašreizējā mēneša īri, plus visi rēķini.
Un tiklīdz tu būsi izmācījies, tevi tik svaigu un nepieredzējušu uzreiz neņems augstās profesijās ar 3k algu ja nav pazīšanu. Pirmie gadi būs jāstiepj ar 800€ neto (ja tev paveiksies, citiem tie ir 500€) un tad kad tev būs jau 30, tikai tad tu varēsi dzīvot kaut cik normālu dzīvi.
Varbūt tad kad būs 40, varēsi atļauties pirmo ceļojumu.
Uj aizmirsu pieminēt ka visam cenas aug. Bet var jau pārtikt no instant Ramen kādu laiku.
2 Minimālās algas lai izdzīvotu, 3 lai dzīvotu, 4 lai uzdzīvotu.
12 comments
Diezgan precīzi, atbilst statistikai.
Vienas personas mājsaimniecība, kas strādā par minimālo algu 40h/ned, ir oficiāli zem nabadzības sliekšņa, jo minimālās bruto nekādi nesanāk tie 641e pēc nodokļiem.
https://preview.redd.it/nwk95c059ike1.png?width=783&format=png&auto=webp&s=f4e6529c822b7c1365df0b70fe7d7e38427c43bb
53? Rookie numbers
We’re 2nd greatest country in the world 😎
W Japan and U.S checks out lol
As a Turkish who live in Latvia, I can say it is piece of shit. You can not maintain one month with minimum salary in Turkey. Price is almost same, then also actually in Turkey meat is expensive than Latvia. Rental is same, but mortgage is expensive than Latvia again. If you want to take a look price about rental, house and car prices you can visit sahibinden.com
This diagram defines poverty line as “50% of the median disposable income in the country.” It does not indicate how much income you need to survive.
This indicates that most Turks have very low disposable income (which is true due to hyperinflation) so you don’t need many hours of minimum wage to exceed the median.
Americans have high disposable income, so you need to work a lot to exceed the median.
And America varies a lot.
Maybe I am living in my own bubble, but person who hasnt just started first job , shoudnt rely on minimum wage. Its minimums i.e there is no more less qualified job down the line than this one, once you get expirience even if its in that same job, person should earn more. Thus minimum wage statistics in their core are extremely unreliable metric. Also if we raise that one, then whole slew of issues on high end jobs that people will think overpaid will get more since some are based on minimum wage, while regular person wouldnt be affected that much,
Are social benefits crap here, specially compared to some more developed countries? Probably , but this statistic seems nonsensical for slew of reasons (it makes sense when operates with those numbers but those numbers arent that relevant for actual picture). Also why US is so low on chart- because they pretty much dont have minimum wage that would remotely correlate with reality , not to mention any US based statistic is nonsense to begin with since US is bigger than EU , but statistics view it as monolith entity like is its for California or Nebraska? Would be same saying EU has this and that and then take Denmark as benchmark, and then extrapolate that people in Romania have same standards.
Need to increase defence budget to 5%, solves problems 👌
Another nonsense Reddit bs.
Japan “escaping poverty” in just 14 hours a week? Yeah, right, like Tokyo’s rent’s that cheap on minimum wage! And the U.S. at 80 hours? That’s basically two full-time jobs just to scrape by—sounds like someone’s calculator partied too hard. Sure, it’s sourced from the OECD, but without the full breakdown, these numbers smell fishy as hell. Minimum wages, benefits, and living costs vary way too much for this to be straight-up truth—looks like Reddit’s serving up half-baked data again.
Frim which arse these figures are pulled out?
Pirmais ko tikko izmācījies cilvēks var darīt ir iestāties darbā un gulēt parkā uz beņķa jo ja vēlies kur dzīvot, tev paprasīs iemaksāt vismaz 300€ depozītu, pašreizējā mēneša īri, plus visi rēķini.
Un tiklīdz tu būsi izmācījies, tevi tik svaigu un nepieredzējušu uzreiz neņems augstās profesijās ar 3k algu ja nav pazīšanu. Pirmie gadi būs jāstiepj ar 800€ neto (ja tev paveiksies, citiem tie ir 500€) un tad kad tev būs jau 30, tikai tad tu varēsi dzīvot kaut cik normālu dzīvi.
Varbūt tad kad būs 40, varēsi atļauties pirmo ceļojumu.
Uj aizmirsu pieminēt ka visam cenas aug. Bet var jau pārtikt no instant Ramen kādu laiku.
2 Minimālās algas lai izdzīvotu, 3 lai dzīvotu, 4 lai uzdzīvotu.
Comments are closed.