[OC] Who Supports Building of Nuclear Reactors across Europe?

Posted by Project_TempoEU

25 comments
  1. Still one of the worst mistakes weve ever made is not building more nuclear

  2. The ever-evasive “Portugal is not in Eastern Europe” map.

  3. Wonder that Finland is so low, wasnt reactor 3 of Olkilouto build with huge backing from the population for a whopping 11 billions and 20 years of construction time ?

  4. it feels too late. everything feels too late. nuclear reactors take *decades* to build. earth is heating up, yet politicians continue the grandstanding for short term gain. soon  our ecosystem will no longer be able to support 8 *billion* humans.  Build the reactors, don’t build the reactors; it doesnt really matter much anyways

  5. It is always the same. Results depending on who is paying those who are asking the questions. Last year the same question was asked by forsa in Germany on behalf of nuclear sceptical people and only 29 answered yes to the same question. So why are we posting lobby stuff on here?!
    I on my behalf do not like it from either side.

  6. There’s a wiki page that lists European reactors and Germany’s section is such a sad sight.

  7. Nuclear energy is too expensive and not green. We don’t need it, we need more renewable energy.

  8. Ayyy, nuclear is def the way of the future. What has happened in the past with Fukushima, Chernobyl, and three mile island was tragic, but we have a better understanding of how this form of energy works and the safety measures behind it are getting better as we progress! It is an incredibly efficient form of energy and we need to heavily invest in it as a form of energy production for our future.

  9. Sweden France and Netherlands have the same number but Sweden is still placed slightly further right.. infuriating, not beautiful, I’ll think about that all day.

  10. lets see how high the support is once Poland starts to build their first reactor …

  11. It’s strange that this doesn’t account for how much energy each country already gets from nuclear plants. For example, France already has a high baseline.

  12. Please check out the “Söder-Challenge” for bavarian ministry president Markus Söder.

  13. That’s a weird selection of countries, like they took most of the EU countries but then also UK for some reason and left out any others.

  14. Ireland’s higher than I expected, because we’re almost exclusively only powered by renewable energy. Nuclear would be a downgrade.

    I’m definitely pro nuclear as a coal/oil replacement but Ireland’s grand

  15. Hey u/Project_TempoEU, feel free to tell us more about this “Project Tempo”.

    Why does your website immediately redirect to me “Create an account” page? Why does your stupid thinktank need to operate reddit accounts to spread whatever agenda?

  16. seems weird coming from Slovakia, since with new “Block 4 Mochovce” we will be number one in nuclear energy as share of all electricity supply

  17. This is not a tross Europe, it’s across a weird mix of the EU but also the UK? Why cut out Norway and Switzerland if you’re gonna include the UK, and then call it Europe? Weird.

  18. I’m from Latvia. While Latvia isn’t really that anti-nuclear, you gotta understand that it’s a poor country and people are fed up with energy investments being a too big chunk of everyone’s tax-money while not seeing the promised results. A nuclear power plant is not something we can afford, especially with it being a country of rivers and alot of potential for hydro and wind, which does not cost 1/10 of our GDP. There were talks of joint nuclear plant with Lithuania, but not sure how are they going.

    There’s also tiny little detail about how Lithuania had to close it’s nuclear plant to get allowed into EU. If I’m not mistaken, Chernobyl TV series were partly filmed in that plant as it still looked somewhat new.

Comments are closed.