De Wever: “Logical that Belgium sends troops to Ukraine”

by atrocious_cleva82

14 comments
  1. >De Wever: “It seems logical that Belgium is sending troops to Ukraine”

    >Prime Minister De Wever argues for caution when it comes to sending European troops to Ukraine. First there must be a peace agreement with sufficient security guarantees. “And we are not there yet.”

    >According to De Wever, it would be logical that Belgium also sends troops in that case. But then there must be American back cover, he thinks. “Without American support, that seems to me little realistic.”

  2. I’m not sure they WANT the Belgian troops there? They probably just burn down some field with their own ammo storages adjacent or so?

  3. Many USA weapons systems come with a disclaimer that they can only be used against targets that the US agrees with. And we need to buy US ammunition.
    I don’t see those F-16s supporting Ukraine any time soon.

  4. I could swear I read somewhere the Ukrainians didn’t want the F16s just yet, because they would be an easy target. Belgium’s reaction was: ok, then WE will keep them for spare parts ourselves.

    And now they’re going to send them anyway?

    Edit: Easy target *on the ground*

  5. “A European top”? “pulling their hands of Ukraine”? “President Zensky”?

    What website is this from? That is some truly horrific writing.

  6. I want thesame sweater Zelensky is wearing, what brand is that?

  7. Logisch inderdaad. We moeten aan de juiste kant van de geschiedenis staan.

  8. For any peacekeeping force it is paramount that morale is maintained. We are world leaders in opening pintjes and serving frietjes. It is clear what our duty in the future of Europe and Ukraine must be.

  9. Will he also send his sons to the front? Don’t think so…

Comments are closed.