‘The measures include 6,000 missiles, consisting of anti-tank and high explosive weapons, and £25m in financial backing for the Ukrainian military.’
At what point are NATO considered “involved” here? Because although they’re not sending troops directly, several NATO countries are funneling money and arms to Ukraine. I worry that this will eventually serve to inflame tensions to a similar degree that direct involvement would.
I never really considered that WW3 would be a possibility in my lifetime until now. I still don’t think it’s very likely, but it’s definitely a legitimate concern and that’s quite something.
2 comments
‘The measures include 6,000 missiles, consisting of anti-tank and high explosive weapons, and £25m in financial backing for the Ukrainian military.’
At what point are NATO considered “involved” here? Because although they’re not sending troops directly, several NATO countries are funneling money and arms to Ukraine. I worry that this will eventually serve to inflame tensions to a similar degree that direct involvement would.
I never really considered that WW3 would be a possibility in my lifetime until now. I still don’t think it’s very likely, but it’s definitely a legitimate concern and that’s quite something.