Sabine Lake pipeline debate raises environmental concerns

PORT ARTHUR, Texas — A proposed crude oil pipeline running through the Sabine Lake has sparked debate among Southeast Texans, with concerns raised over potential environmental risks and the project’s ability to withstand natural disasters.

At a public meeting on March 12, the U.S. Maritime Administration heard from six citizens about the 37-mile pipeline project, which would carry crude oil from Energy Transfer’s Nederland terminal to approximately 100 miles off the coast of Johnson Bayou, Louisiana. 

While four speakers supported the project, two expressed worries about its long-term safety and environmental impact.

Energy Transfer, the pipeline’s operator, argues the project will help reduce emissions by eliminating the need for smaller ships to transport oil offshore.

“Pipelines are the safest mode of transportation of fossil fuels, and this pipeline will be built meeting and often exceeding industry standards for pipeline safety,” said Lisa Coleman, Energy Transfer’s public relations manager. “It will be tested and also monitored 24/7 once in operation.”

Despite reassurances, environmental advocates remain skeptical. John Beard Jr., founder and CEO of the Port Arthur Community Action Network and a member of the Save Sabine Lake Coalition, warned of potential risks to the lake and surrounding Gulf Coast communities.

“It creates a situation that can potentially be very harmful to that lake, and a lot of people depend on it not just for recreation but for hunting and fishing and for making their livelihood,” Beard said. “And last but not least, that lake flows out into the Gulf of Mexico, so under hurricane conditions and other conditions, how will those things be mitigated? All of that should be and must be considered in deciding whether or not to put this pipeline in place.”

For those unable to attend the meeting, the U.S. Maritime Administration will continue accepting public comments and questions regarding the project through April 7.