UK foreign secretary: Putin cannot veto deployment of peacekeepers in Ukraine

https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2025/03/20/7503847/

24 comments

  1. UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy has stated that Kremlin leader Vladimir Putin has no veto power over the potential deployment of foreign troops in Ukraine.

  3. Peacekeepers are assigned by both sides of the conflict. Via UN.

    Country with a veto on SC absolutely can veto them.

  4. >UK foreign secretary: Putin cannot veto deployment of peacekeepers in Ukraine

    Technically true, as far as European Union or NATO peacekeeping forces are concerned.

    But, Trump will probably veto that in-effect, on orders from his *massa,* Putin.

  6. But he can shut down Heathrow by burning down an electrical substation.

  7. Why is it that Russia can bring in North Korea but Ukraine has to be on its own anyways?

  8. Russia invites NK troups to fight with Russian troups. Putin forbids EU to install peacekeepers in Ukraine??????

  9. Technically when Khattab the Quatari Arab attacked Russian sovereign territory in the 1990 ties…. While grabbing land, taking towns. Should RU have nuked Quatar and arabian states? Technically they could. It would’ve been lawful.

    But.

  10. If its EU or NATO then yes, technically the Kremlin has no authority.

    Unless the White House states that the President of Russian Federation does.

    If in case of the UNSC, Russia and China both will definitely veto any proposed action by the western bloc.

  11. Sure they cannot. Just like UK cannot call these peacekeepers then. Just fertilizer for the soil.

  12. UK literally the only country apart from Ukraine to have any balls in this entire discussion.

  14. He is right, only if the peacekeeping nations actually have intentions to get involved further into this conflict.

  15. Putin vetoed Poland retracting from landmine convention while russia was never part of it. Fuck him

  16. Ukraine is a sovereign country and only it can approve who does or doesn’t enter its territory.

    Russia has invaded and laid the country to waste. Ukraine has fought valiantly and beaten the pulp out of Russia thus far, but Russia is not interested in peace and wants to keep going.

    Ukraine is asking for peace and it’s asking for an independent force of peacekeepers to uphold that peace and end the war in Ukraine.

    Unless Russia wants to start a war with the rest of Europe, it will have to accept it. It’s the aggressor and invader and it doesn’t get tell Ukraine who it can or cannot host on its land.

  17. Definitely can’t veto, but what’s going to happen when they get bombed? This might spiral out of control very fast.
    So I guess while UK diplomat stated the obvious, we won’t be seeing anything other that token presence

  18. Of course, Putin cannot veto this.

    In the same way that he cannot veto Ukraine’s membership in the EU.

    And a possible new military alliance similar to NATO without the US, but including Ukraine.

    These dictators including the orange maniac should learn that they cannot rule over sovereign countries.

  19. All this talk is hilarious when they know they won’t be going in without American guarantees 😂

  23. The moment ruzzia brought North koreans, iranians and Africans into their terrorist act of war, they can suck a bag of dicks what rest of The World Will bring in ukraine

  24. The only thing pootin understands is not backing away from him or showing force. Chump has done neither, but as we know he is a Russian agent/asset call it what you will but weak definitely.

Comments are closed.