“The number one risk for this organisation was the toxicity of its lead patron’s brand,” Chandauka told the Financial Times.
“The way the organisation had been set up in 2006, was no longer appropriate in 2023 in a post-Black Lives Matter world,” said Chandauka. “Funders were asking for locally led initiatives.”
Chandauka said she had refused what she described as a request by the royal’s team to defend his wife, Meghan, in the media after negative coverage of her. “I said no, we’re not setting a precedent by which we become an extension of the Sussex PR machine,” she said.
https://archive.ph/2025.03.29-051041/https://www.ft.com/content/8fc9561d-c145-4542-a32a-1707573c012b
Posted by lily_lightcup
5 comments
Well, I for one, have questions.
It did look strange. They said that they were closing the charity because one woman wanted to sue. People sue their workplaces all the time, it can’t be a valid reason for closing.
Now this is getting good…..
They’re accusing her of financial mismanagement with very detailed accusations, the whole board resigned with sharpness, trustees have gone on record and she’s accusing Harry and only Harry mind you, not Seeiso who also resigned with personal attacks.
I notice she hasn’t even addressed the allegations regarding the financial setbacks that the charity suffered under her tenure as Chair Woman.
I can’t wait for the discovery of the lawsuit and the findings of the charity commission.
Ohhhh so now it is crystal clear.
Instead of defending herself with evidence, she is attacking Harry and Meghan of course. How predictable. It just shows to me she is guilty af
Harry please sue her…
Wow, if you didn’t like Harry’s “brand,” why on earth did you take a job running his charity??
Her motives here are extremely questionable. She’s basically killed its position to help people in favor of a media fight where she’s lobbing personal insults???
What the heck is going on?
Comments are closed.