Greenland “Absolutely Critical” For Hunting Russian Submarines: Top U.S. General In Europe

https://www.twz.com/sea/greenland-absolutely-critical-for-hunting-russian-submarines-top-u-s-general-in-europe

by AcanthocephalaEast79

27 comments

  1. Mfs are part of NATO – this hunting was always allowed

  2. You know what, so is Alaska. Give it to Canada, the line between Alaska and Canada is just drawn on a map and artificial.

  3. yeah, Americans don’t want such an unfriendly country to Russia holding a strategic position like thst

  4. Trump’s businesses are ‘absolutely critical’ for Hunting Russian spies – so the EU will just have to take them.

    Hmmm, this game’s easy.

  5. There is a contract between the US and Denmark, that allows the US already to station almost any number of military they deem necessary for the security of Greenland. They dont need ownership nor do they fit ethnically as a leader. Cooperate like any other nation would and make your case to use it for that purpose, but dont make up bullshit needs.

  6. What is the problem? You always had the right to do your job there. We Danes are actually pretty easy to talk to…

  7. “If Europe doesn’t have it, they can’t hunt our Russian friends’ submarines”

  8. Good thing they’re our allies then.

    EDIT: didn’t see the sub. Correction: good thing *you’re* our allies then >.<

  9. Hey US, are you planning to hunt the Russian subs or making sure no one does?

  10. But you’re sucking up to Russia lol, be consistent.

  11. >The threat that I worry most about vis-a-vis Europe is not Russia, not China, it’s not any other external actor. What I worry about is the threat from within, the retreat of Europe from some of its most fundamental values,
    JD Vance – Munich Security Conference, February 2025

    Oh, I thought that we should not worry about Russia.

  12. “Top US General in Europe” doesn’t understand how NATO works apparently

  13. Then it is fortunate that the United States already has more or less unlimited military access to Greenland – just as it has been the case for the past seventy years…

  14. The Americans sound more and more like the Russians. What a surprise given Trump’s history…

  15. Doesn’t mean you get to just fucking take it. Trump is Putin in waiting.

  16. So they’re going to annex the territory of a NATO ally that already allows them to do this, in order to hunt submarines belonging to a man that the US President is desperate to please.

  17. I’m not really sure why they seem to believe that “but I want this” is a good negotiating technique.

  18. America is now a puppet state of Russia, why would they ever be hunting their subs?

  19. This reads like: “We need Greeland to hide the russian submarines!”

  20. If only Denmark was willing to work with you on expanding your military presence on Greenland? OH RIGHT THEY WERE…. Just because you can not OWN Greenland didn’t mean you couldn’t 10x your forces there, god damn idiots

  21. The Greenlanders have already been doing a great job, not one single Russian Submarine on Greenland has evaded them

  22. i didnt know greenland was mobile…. i mean that would take any sub by surprise when an island pings you with one ping only

  23. They have military bases on Greenland already. Build a sub base in agreement with the locals and Denmark and leave it at that? Why do you need the whole fucking island?

  26. So let me get this straight, they want Greenland all to themselves to gain military advantages over Russia, while doing everything they can to give Russia more advantages over others, even themselves, they’ve even made a fucking golden Russian card… the dumbest country ever

  27. Then we should be more polite to Greenlanders and collaborate…

Comments are closed.