Are they purely decoration? Are they for the signal cables (like they’re being used for now)? Is there another reason?

by no0dlek8

12 comments
  1. I have always wondered the same! Practical or aesthetic? Seating? Spaces for advertisement?  

  2. I’m no architect or structural engineer but I presume they serve the same purpose as an arched bridge in that a curved vertical wall hold more weight back in an retaining wall than a flat one.

  3. They were originally built as an aesthetic feature to give the appearance of more space. Barbican station did this well.

    The electrical installation here is a later addition.

  4. These are brick retaining walls. Unlike reinforced concrete which we use now, brick walls do not do well under pressure against thier face which results in bending.

    Much like an arched bridge these are designed to spread loads in compression, with regular buttesses. The victorians built styles of retaining walls everywhere.

    They are a wonderful example of how functional design can create aesthetically pleasing architecture when designing within the limitations of the materials at hand.

  5. Zeez alcoves ? Sort of, nooks and crannies ? Yez, I like zis, nooks and crannies

  6. Wrong answers only. The Romans did them so they will protect sculptures from rain.
    Lepricorns used to shoot their rainbow from such places.
    There is electrical infrastructure there. Placed in the alcoves.
    Make it look posh

  7. Fun fact – if you hold your phone a bit closer to that coil of wires, it’ll start to wirelessly charge

Comments are closed.