The foreign nationalities most likely to be arrested for sex offences – including one country with a rate up to 24 times higher than Brits

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14599087/foreign-nationalities-arrested-sex-offences.html

by ParkedUpWithCoffee

21 comments

  1. I think it’s important to be honest about the stats around the impact of immigration. Both the good, and in this case bad. 

    It’s much preferable to trading anecdotes and moralising. 

  3. Before we jump on the “racist” bandwagon, what’s the source for this, besides dailymail, is this reported police information, in which case is pretty damning no?

    Or shall we just bury our head in the sands and watch our western progression that’s finally accepted gays/women to have rights? 

    There’s gotta be a conversation sometime….

    tolerance isn’t a good thing if you got that much hate against a culture that won’t adapt to yours. 

    Hell most of that culture isn’t adaptable to anywhere else’s, hence the wars….so I beg you to see reason, where are we headed if we don’t do something now, we’re already in poverty…..there’s already crime….there’s already silencing/arresting of people’s free speech over a man questioning a schools self promotion. 

    There has to be a limit here, a reasonable limit to how much we can take, if we did half the shit some of these people do, we’d have our hands chopped off. 

  4. > Because the supplied data only looks at arrests, it does not mean they were all convicted. Suspects may have also been nicked multiple times.

    A very important bit of relevant information tucked away in the middle of the article and under the many, many adverts.

    Wouldn’t be a daily fail article without trying to hide counter arguments to their abject racism.

  5. If one person commits multiple offensives, it would screw up the rates. I mean, no one would say that US presidents commit sex crimes at higher rates than the average American just because one of them was found guilty of 34 offences (that convicted as well, not arrested for, not done).

  6. In this country you’re (supposedly) innocent until proven guilty. Why focus on arrests and not convictions? Do those statistics not fit the DM’s narrative or something?

  10. All far less than the rate of investigation of male policemen in the Met for sex offences. 650 of the 46000 under investigation for sexual and domestic violence offences. That 1413 per 100k not taking into account that about 25% of the met are women.

  11. I feel like this thread will attract a lot of comments that will end up deleted…

  13. This is a Mail article so be aware that it will have a Mail take.

    However, there are legitimate concerns as to why we allow people from a lot of these places to come here and stay. Their culture is not compatible with secular western liberalism, they have low education and wealth, they have high levels of crime and they don’t add anything of value to the nation.

  14. People from incompatible cultures who are brought up to think women are inferior and simply a means to an end continue to act as such whilst in Britain. I am shocked I tell you.

  15. > Huge gaps in the available data on the contentious topic of migrant crime means the real figures may be very different.

    Top notch analysis from the Daily Heil as usual.

  17. “most likely to be arrested”. What does that mean exactly?

  18. A simple criteria for visa eligibility should be ‘on the balance of probabilities, are they more or less likely to increase GDP/Cap’

    This would filter out a lot of people like this.

  19. Ah I would have lost everything betting on Korean, Swedish and Japanese.

  20. Is the Mail saying that because 226 Sudanese have been arrested (not convicted) of sexual offences, we should also punish the other 99% of Sudanese asylum seekers, with no such stain on their reputation, and any future ones?

    What sort of political ideology favours punishment and discrimination against a whole group based on allegations against a tiny minority? It’s where the Mail seems to be.

  21. As a member of public, I will not take this complaining from Tory MPs(according to the article). They were given 14 years to solve the problem, and chose to do nothing.

    Something must be done about this as this is a basic public safety and border control issue, melanin is not the issue here.

Comments are closed.