by artyartem1

36 comments
  1. Another wonderful idea of our enlightened government

  2. Soo can i get GROM team under my house for posting a picture of sunset over a port or bridge?

  3. makes total sense in our country. its not like i can go to any store and see boobs displayed in the “for men” section of the papers without even buying anything

  4. Russians are sabotaging primarily civilian infrastructure for years and y’all complaining that the government finally does something about it?

  5. It’s not an anti-espionage law.

    It’s an ass cover for all the dirty politicians.

    Want to import toxic food? ARGH! Cannot photograph, to the jail.

    Government doing something shady? ARGH! To the spy jail!

    An Oligarch visiting a Ministry? ARGH! To the spy jail!

  6. Civilian infrastructure is still targeted in war, key railways, key ports, airports, the power grid. why are you surprised?

  7. How does a ban like this get enforced? It’s so broad I can’t believe there’s an effective way to enforce it? And if espionage is the concern, then this does nothing to those who take discrete photos because, well, they’re spies who can take discrete photos.

  8. Introduction slavery in small steps. Taking out freedom piece by piece using fear of imaginary spies.

  9. And that is the right thing to do. Believe me, i’m Ukrainian

  10. Will it be any marks possible to notice for regular tourist? If you have government building in the middle of main town square it can be not so easy to understand.

  11. This is another authoritarian tool of oppression (like “chat control”) that gets enfored whenever it suits the government. It’s gonna hit a lot of random people taking pictures not even aware that by chance a “sensitive” bridge or a random government office ended up on the frame.

    I for example regularly go on long photo walks, drifting through city streets with no aim for hours, hoping for something interesting to capture. There’s a 0% chance I haven’t taken pictures already of some of those objects without even knowing. Poznań Główny from various angles for example, just because it’s so incredibly ugly and I want to be prepared for before-after photos once it gets replaced. And then there’s millions of tourists running around with cameras, like in central Warsaw, which happens to be busy with government offices. What about my pictures of [Lake Malta](https://www.reddit.com/r/Poznan/comments/1jlupzi/empty_lake_malta/), an artifical lake that could be used by saboteurs to cause a flood once it’s filled again? I just missed the ~~dam~~ lock/weir(?) by ten meters or so.

    Enforcement on the street is already going to be arbitrary. Depending on who you are and how much prosecutors and judges like your face, outcomes will also vastly differ.

    It also gives the executive branch the power to arrest anyone nearly anywhere at any time for no reason, because as soon as you handle a smartphone, the “reasonable” assumption is of course that you could have illegaly taken a picture. What would have been wrong in 1950 is much worse today, when virtually the entire population walks around with a camera 24/7.

    And then It does of course nothing to prevent espionage or sabotage, so it’s also populism.

    I expect this to be challenged in European courts. I’m also surprised to see this being passed by this government.

  12. I guess I won’t be able to take pictures of my trips to Poland from now on? I used to love visiting and taking some pictures just like I do everywhere I go. I like public infrastructure and I take pictures in many countries. Train stations. Trams. Bridges. Architecture. Etc…

    Weird.

  13. Na pewno ten zakaz zniechęcić szpiegów do robienia zdjęć. To tak jakby powiedzieć, że zakaz posiadania narkotyków zniechęca dilerów do ich sprzedaży. Tego typu zakazy robienia zdjęć będą bardziej służyły jako wskaźnik tego co jest na tyle ważną infrastrukturą krytyczną, że warto by było jej zrobić zdjęcia z perspektywy szpiega

  14. Absolutely fantastic news. Maybe this will encourage others countries to also mobilise more seriously.

  15. It is not true and misinterpretation – this law will not ban foto on those 20,000 locations – it only open a possibility to introduce photo ban for up to 20,000 locations , bit additional requirement need to be fulfilled.

    Not good anyway but article is misleading.

    Places that will be covered with this ban need to have quite big sign placed in visible place every 50 m so it should bye difficult miss it and accidentally taka photo of the place that is under this ban.
    On the other hand You can always walk next to those places with big camera and not take any photos.

  16. Sweden had a similiar law, they’re called Skyddsobjekt here. Not all Skyddsobjekt have a photography ban, but a large number have. Some examples generally are airports airside, police stations, water treatment plants, electrical plants etc.

  17. Criminal state does criminal things.

    Imagine my surprise xD

  18. And slowly your freedoms will just be taken away, one after the other.

Comments are closed.