Its the only thing she can talk about.

44 comments
  1. 9 of the 17 candidates were women
    At least 3 of the 17 candidates were from what could be described as “diverse” backgrounds

  2. Did I lose because I’m a wannabe career politician who takes every criticism or failure to be the result of racism?

    No, it is Ireland’s lack of diversity that is the problem.

  3. Its a shame how Americanized Ireland has become, people obsessing so much over gender, race etc. Such a shame.

  4. With comments like that, you’d be inclined to ignore all her opinions on racism and diversity, which will perpetuate her stance even more.

  5. Don’t live in Dublin, so haven’t had much exposure to her, but what’s the big issue here lads? She’s calling it as SHE see’s it. Let’s face it the majority of people on here are white natives to Ireland, so we have not lived in her shoes.

    What am I missing here? Why the digs?

  6. I don’t understand why people think women or people of diversity are going to be any different from the ones we have in now, look across the water Thatcher was a woman, Priti Patel is of Indian descent and is a woman, we need good candidates regardless of what they have between their legs or what colour their skin is

  7. More women?

    What is a woman, because as far as I can tell from the news lately their is no definition. Maybe all the people she considers men are actually women?

  8. She’s just listening to what people want to hear and giving it to them.

    Same as SF.

    Unlike FF/FG who aren’t listening, nor giving.

    If popularity couldn’t be lower, but re-election rates couldn’t be higher, you know you’ve won.

  9. She…er…has a point no? Isn’t it a good thing that different communities have political representation?

    Tom Clonan has done very important work in representing conditions in the army (especially how women are treated) as well as whistleblowing, but you don’t see the same outcry over him

  10. Hazel Chu is a gobshite, living in fantasy American twitter politics land. Perhaps she can get a job in the private sector instead of her being forced on the electorate at every election.

  11. Its the American play book.

    Realistically I’d argue there’s no need for any particular group of people to be there. If we as a society believe that men, women and all races are equal then those features shouldn’t matter. I understand that some issues are specific to certain groups, but any government worth it’s votes will seek out 3rd party consultation on those issues.

    We should be encouraging intelligent, reasonable politicians to run. Not politicians who meet the ethnic or sexual criteria.

  12. BREAKING NEWS: politician mentions one of her main running points!

    What do you actually think you’ve done here OP? Do you see this as some kind of *gotcha* moment? Lmaoooooo

  13. “individual of diverse backgrounds”

    What does it even mean for an *individual* to be diverse???

  14. The candidates running were about 52% women and 17% non-Native or ‘diverse’. Why do we need more women or more diverse candidates running and to talk about them like they are being prevented from running when it looks like a pretty fair split to me?

  15. Good to see common sense prevailing. Identity politics only serves to divide people further. She has nothing in her armoury bar this type of thing. Hopefully people will see through this rhetoric as certain groups try to ram it down our throats that Ireland is a backward racist hellhole when nothing could be further from the truth.

  16. Hazel chu is an irrelevant person trying her damnest to be relevant. Just look at her antics in the mansion house where she reduces the office to her kid and calls her the mini mayor.
    Hopefully she’ll fade into oblivion and we’ll hear no more of her.

Leave a Reply