Today is a gauntlet for President Donald Trump’s executive decisions in court, as multiple judges now are concerned that the Trump administration may be openly disobeying court orders and flouting fundamental rights.

Judge Amy Berman Jackson of the DC District Court holds a hearing at 11 a.m. ET over the firing of more than 1,000 workers at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau this week, that may disregard court rulings that the administration shouldn’t make cuts that would interfere with the agency’s work at this time.

And Judge Trevor McFadden, also in Washington, DC, hears arguments over whether the White House’s changes to its press corps are in violation of the Associated Press’ First Amendment rights, which the judge has said must be preserved.

Those two hearings are only the latest where judges look closely at accusations the administration is ignoring court orders, especially ones from trial-level district judges.

The accusations of Trump officials intentionally disobeying the courts has simmered all week in dual cases about the Trump administration deporting immigrants to be kept in a prison for terrorists in El Salvador.

Just after midnight Friday, the administration asked a federal circuit court to stop criminal contempt proceedings that have been launched by Judge James Boasberg in Washington. Those proceedings regard the administration sending planes of migrants to El Salvador despite Boasberg telling lawyers for the administration to turn the planes around because the deportations may not have been legal.

All of this comes less than 24 hours after one of the country’s longest-serving and well-respected conservative judges, J. Harvie Wilkinson III of the 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals, a Reagan appointee, penned a seven-page order warning the Trump administration that it may be crumbling American democracy.

That, too, was in an immigration case where the administration has done little to facilitate the return of one migrant mistakenly sent to the Salvadoran prison.

“If today the Executive claims the right to deport without due process and in disregard of court orders, what assurance will there be tomorrow that it will not deport American citizens and then disclaim responsibility to bring them home? And what assurance shall there be that the Executive will not train its broad discretionary powers upon its political enemies?” Wilkinson wrote, in an unusually bold statement.