I don’t think they will go with traitor I think they will go with terrorist or terrorist sympathizer. They have already established that term as a way to deny someone their rights.
Well at least they don’t have to continue watching the biggest shit show this country has ever seen
> Supposing an emperor was persuaded to wear a new suit of clothes whose material was so fine that, to the common eye, the clothes weren’t there. And suppose a little boy pointed out this fact in a loud, clear voice…
> Then you have The Story of the Emperor Who Had No Clothes.
> But if you knew a bit more, it would be The Story of the Boy Who Got a Well-Deserved Thrashing from His Dad for Being Rude to Royalty, and Was Locked Up.
> Or The Story of the Whole Crowd Who Were Rounded Up by the Guards and Told ‘This Didn’t Happen, OK? Does Anyone Want to Argue?’
> Or it could be a story of how a whole kingdom suddenly saw the benefit of the ‘new clothes’, and developed an enthusiasm for healthy sports in a lively and refreshing atmosphere which got many new adherents every year, and led to a recession caused by the collapse of the conventional clothing industry.
> It could even be a story about The Great Pneumonia Epidemic of ’09.
> It all depends on how much you know.
–Sir Terry Pratchett
Clearly the child is an illegal immigrant gang member. Oh and we won’t give them a trial to prove otherwise.
This can’t happen. Where are the diapers? Or at least the pattern he leaves on the floor behind him?
The American version is very different, it’s called “The whole country wore no clothes”
7 comments
I don’t think they will go with traitor I think they will go with terrorist or terrorist sympathizer. They have already established that term as a way to deny someone their rights.
Well at least they don’t have to continue watching the biggest shit show this country has ever seen
> Supposing an emperor was persuaded to wear a new suit of clothes whose material was so fine that, to the common eye, the clothes weren’t there. And suppose a little boy pointed out this fact in a loud, clear voice…
> Then you have The Story of the Emperor Who Had No Clothes.
> But if you knew a bit more, it would be The Story of the Boy Who Got a Well-Deserved Thrashing from His Dad for Being Rude to Royalty, and Was Locked Up.
> Or The Story of the Whole Crowd Who Were Rounded Up by the Guards and Told ‘This Didn’t Happen, OK? Does Anyone Want to Argue?’
> Or it could be a story of how a whole kingdom suddenly saw the benefit of the ‘new clothes’, and developed an enthusiasm for healthy sports in a lively and refreshing atmosphere which got many new adherents every year, and led to a recession caused by the collapse of the conventional clothing industry.
> It could even be a story about The Great Pneumonia Epidemic of ’09.
> It all depends on how much you know.
–Sir Terry Pratchett
Clearly the child is an illegal immigrant gang member. Oh and we won’t give them a trial to prove otherwise.
This can’t happen. Where are the diapers? Or at least the pattern he leaves on the floor behind him?
The American version is very different, it’s called “The whole country wore no clothes”
I’ve been saying this for years.
Comments are closed.