How does this make them two faced? Did they have the opposite opinion in secret or something?
To be fair, I think the note might be confusing the GRR Bill (on how one gets a GRC) and this ruling on the application of the Equality Act on how people with a GRC relate to the protections on the grounds of sex.
You can support the GRR Bill and still be in favour of a position where sex means biological sex for the purposes of the relevant sections of the Equality Act. The two aren’t inherently contradictory.
Vote Reform is the answer 🇬🇧🏴🌈🏳️🌈
Who honestly takes him seriously anymore? Apart from his luvvies? And by luvvies I mean the people on his team enabling him and the Gen Z yoof wing of the branch who still think he’ll be First Minister.
There were a bunch of craven decisions where Labour under Sarwar needlessly fell in line with the SNP during the Sturgeon Government to support unpopular policies. I believe because she was a better political operator than him and he couldn’t handle her aggressive style.
The GRR bill was one example, the hate crime bill was another, the ‘too many whites’ rhetoric around BLM was a third, MUP was a fourth- I could go on.
There is little point in an Opposition which doesn’t actually oppose and now it leaves Sarwar unable to capitalise on poorly thought out or unpopular SNP policy without looking like he has no principles.
He has too much baggage. SLAB needs rid of him.
Supported SNP all through Sturgeon. Was going to go green. This secured it. Green all the way.
He’s always been a sleekit wee cunt tbh. I have a feeling he’s deleted that tweet too. I could be wrong but I couldn’t find it
Show me a politician who isn’t a lying two faced fecker
I’d like to say the wheels are coming off the Sarwarmobile but it feels like he’s going to take the whole clown car of SLAB off the cliff missing the corner entirely.
While unpopular on Reddit, this will be a vote winner if polling is to be believed. Don’t expect Labour to do anything to mitigate this ruling.
11 comments
How does this make them two faced? Did they have the opposite opinion in secret or something?
To be fair, I think the note might be confusing the GRR Bill (on how one gets a GRC) and this ruling on the application of the Equality Act on how people with a GRC relate to the protections on the grounds of sex.
You can support the GRR Bill and still be in favour of a position where sex means biological sex for the purposes of the relevant sections of the Equality Act. The two aren’t inherently contradictory.
Vote Reform is the answer 🇬🇧🏴🌈🏳️🌈
Who honestly takes him seriously anymore? Apart from his luvvies? And by luvvies I mean the people on his team enabling him and the Gen Z yoof wing of the branch who still think he’ll be First Minister.
There were a bunch of craven decisions where Labour under Sarwar needlessly fell in line with the SNP during the Sturgeon Government to support unpopular policies. I believe because she was a better political operator than him and he couldn’t handle her aggressive style.
The GRR bill was one example, the hate crime bill was another, the ‘too many whites’ rhetoric around BLM was a third, MUP was a fourth- I could go on.
There is little point in an Opposition which doesn’t actually oppose and now it leaves Sarwar unable to capitalise on poorly thought out or unpopular SNP policy without looking like he has no principles.
He has too much baggage. SLAB needs rid of him.
Supported SNP all through Sturgeon. Was going to go green. This secured it. Green all the way.
https://i.redd.it/e6cm1m0z6gwe1.gif
Sarwar can fuck all the way off.
He’s always been a sleekit wee cunt tbh. I have a feeling he’s deleted that tweet too. I could be wrong but I couldn’t find it
Show me a politician who isn’t a lying two faced fecker
I’d like to say the wheels are coming off the Sarwarmobile but it feels like he’s going to take the whole clown car of SLAB off the cliff missing the corner entirely.
While unpopular on Reddit, this will be a vote winner if polling is to be believed. Don’t expect Labour to do anything to mitigate this ruling.
Comments are closed.