That message being if you’re rich enough you can rape girls and get away with it?
The message: she gives zero fucks about the UK, sexual abuse of minors, or the sanctity of the church she heads. I was pro-Queen until this moment.
The Message: Don’t do the crime if you can’t do the time. Or can’t get your mum to make it all go away.
Was the message that this was a memorial for her husband and his father regardless of Andrews current royal standing?
I don’t know why you filth are complaining. You should be grateful a ROYAL danned to “favour” your daughter and sisters, especially at such a young ages.
/s, I think?
> *”In a way she won’t be bullied into hiding her children away,” she concluded.*
I’m pretty sure no one was bullying the queen into hiding her children away.
I thought it meant that he did not come through the main entrance and meet the Dean and others alongside him.
Quelle surprise
I really don’t give a shit about the queen. She’s just as bad as them all
it was a threat to the people of this nation that none of your daughters are safe if you try anything against the royal family.
That she doesn’t care mommies little boy is a pedophile, or that the British public will be upset with her for supporting him?
A massive slap in the face either way.
Will there be commemorative coins made depicting Prince pervert *NOT* sweating?
I think people are reading too far into this, he was the only one of her kids there unaccompanied, and she probably believes he’s innocent, I think that’s about it. I personally don’t think he’s innocent, but that’s neither here nor there, I don’t think the Queen has done something wrong here.
The message is that Phillip and Elizabeth had several children… like everyone else mostly and sometimes one of this is a creepoid but that does not negate their relationship.
Tell me again about UK law when you get to Boris and the boys, maybe then I’ll pay more attention.
Bollocks. He’s an over privileged, self-important abusive piece of shit, but he’s still her son.
Let an old woman going to her late husband’s memorial choose to be accompanied by the son she’s closest to, without interpreting it as a “fuck you” to the rest of us. Once she’s dead, the monarchy ends and he becomes a nobody.
I would imagine every aspect of a public appearance by the Queen has a team of people analysing it to decide what kind of message it sends. So yes. Disappointing.
Yes, the message was *Fuck you, peasants, know your place. He’s my special boy and he can rape sex slaves if he wants.*
Off with their heads.
People shouldn’t be suddenly angry by this. Andrew has had a reputation for this for decades and the Queen has been well aware.
>”I think the message she’s sending is, ‘he’s taken his punishment, he’s taken his medicine, he’s paid up, I suppose, in brute terms, but he is still my son.'”
I don’t think paying his way out of it is the same as taking his punishment. It sure seems like he got away with it scot-free
Not that I’m ever likely to be offered one…
And as a staunch as anti monarchist it would be hypocritical of me to accept one if I was…
But does anyone feel accepting a royal honour is now like accepting a patient care award from Harold Shipman?
This is perhaps the beginning of the end.
When the queen dies, the monarchy soon follows with her?
19 comments
That message being if you’re rich enough you can rape girls and get away with it?
The message: she gives zero fucks about the UK, sexual abuse of minors, or the sanctity of the church she heads. I was pro-Queen until this moment.
The Message: Don’t do the crime if you can’t do the time. Or can’t get your mum to make it all go away.
Was the message that this was a memorial for her husband and his father regardless of Andrews current royal standing?
I don’t know why you filth are complaining. You should be grateful a ROYAL danned to “favour” your daughter and sisters, especially at such a young ages.
/s, I think?
> *”In a way she won’t be bullied into hiding her children away,” she concluded.*
I’m pretty sure no one was bullying the queen into hiding her children away.
I thought it meant that he did not come through the main entrance and meet the Dean and others alongside him.
Quelle surprise
I really don’t give a shit about the queen. She’s just as bad as them all
it was a threat to the people of this nation that none of your daughters are safe if you try anything against the royal family.
That she doesn’t care mommies little boy is a pedophile, or that the British public will be upset with her for supporting him?
A massive slap in the face either way.
Will there be commemorative coins made depicting Prince pervert *NOT* sweating?
I think people are reading too far into this, he was the only one of her kids there unaccompanied, and she probably believes he’s innocent, I think that’s about it. I personally don’t think he’s innocent, but that’s neither here nor there, I don’t think the Queen has done something wrong here.
The message is that Phillip and Elizabeth had several children… like everyone else mostly and sometimes one of this is a creepoid but that does not negate their relationship.
Tell me again about UK law when you get to Boris and the boys, maybe then I’ll pay more attention.
Bollocks. He’s an over privileged, self-important abusive piece of shit, but he’s still her son.
Let an old woman going to her late husband’s memorial choose to be accompanied by the son she’s closest to, without interpreting it as a “fuck you” to the rest of us. Once she’s dead, the monarchy ends and he becomes a nobody.
I would imagine every aspect of a public appearance by the Queen has a team of people analysing it to decide what kind of message it sends. So yes. Disappointing.
Yes, the message was *Fuck you, peasants, know your place. He’s my special boy and he can rape sex slaves if he wants.*
Off with their heads.
People shouldn’t be suddenly angry by this. Andrew has had a reputation for this for decades and the Queen has been well aware.
>”I think the message she’s sending is, ‘he’s taken his punishment, he’s taken his medicine, he’s paid up, I suppose, in brute terms, but he is still my son.'”
I don’t think paying his way out of it is the same as taking his punishment. It sure seems like he got away with it scot-free
Not that I’m ever likely to be offered one…
And as a staunch as anti monarchist it would be hypocritical of me to accept one if I was…
But does anyone feel accepting a royal honour is now like accepting a patient care award from Harold Shipman?
This is perhaps the beginning of the end.
When the queen dies, the monarchy soon follows with her?