
King Charles’ wealth jumps by 2000% in 2025 – making him as rich as Sunak and wife
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/king-charles-rich-list-wealth-2025-elizabeth-crown-b2752182.html
by tylerthe-theatre

King Charles’ wealth jumps by 2000% in 2025 – making him as rich as Sunak and wife
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/king-charles-rich-list-wealth-2025-elizabeth-crown-b2752182.html
by tylerthe-theatre
25 comments
Impressive jump, Camilla does have the face for dressage.
“King Charles’ personal fortune has seen a significant boost, rising by £30 million to £640 million in the past year – an increase of 2000 per cent.”
I have a question
>King Charles’ personal fortune has seen a significant boost, rising by £30 million to £640 million in the past year – an increase of 2000 per cent.
Did they change maths while I was asleep?!
What moron wrote and what moron approved this “”King Charles’ personal fortune has seen a significant boost, rising by £30 million to £640 million in the past year – an increase of 2000 per cent.”
Can anyone explain how this is not 5%?
How have they possibly got 2000%. And if it’s plainly wrong how is it still up
640/30 is roughly 20x or 2000% but someone’s going back to school for this basic error
As many people have said, the maths in this article is obviously questionable.
I suspect they meant that “his personal wealth grew FROM £30million to £640million”, which is approximately 2000%
When did Sunak and Wife become a benchmark for wealth?
Thank God for the Royal family…where would we be without them??
I’m not gonna do a math check, I’m only here to hate! No questions asked!
I’m sure he earned all it himself through hard graft
The real question is why was Rishi Sunak wealthier than the literal king of the united kingdom
Can more people post about how the maths might be wrong? Don’t think anyone covered it yet thanks x
How embarrassing. They seem to have done the calculations for a rise FROM 30 million to 640 million, rather than the BY 30 million to 640 million that they are reporting.
30 million increased by 2000% gets you 630 million , so rounding to get nice memorable round numbers it works.
This is nice for King Charles, he didn’t have enough money. And with the economy growing by 0.7% in Q1 and an increase in GDP, hopefully the capitalist are feeling a bit better. The everyday person may actually enjoy an adaptation of communism more with goals suited to their needs, rather than just profit maximisation as the main goal.
Who would have thought that having your parent die and leave you money would make you substantially richer when she was the monarch
Imagine telling someone from the 1800s that we had an prime minister with Indian heritage that was richer than the king
AI can’t do maths, and AI shouldn’t be used without supervision.
I’m just surprised Charles’ personal fortune was “only” £30m
The UK’s total wealth is 12 trillion, that is how wealthy the king is as the monarch is the state in monarchies.
Thank god, I was worried for him after they took away the WFA.
TL:DR – It grew by 4.9% the person who wrote the article is a moron.
Even if you earned £100,000 a year tax free from the day Jesus was born you’d still only have £202m
It is absolutely mental that billionaires exist. The majority of the country are working 45 years to probably make £2.25m max, so why not have a wealth tax that’s 10x that amount.
The “higher rate” tax bracket is 40% and it’s less than double the minimum wage
He’s worth way more than that, all smoke and mirrors with the royals.
Man made insanely rich by an accident of birth makes British tax payer gives him even more money to become even more rich
In other news Britons becoming more poorer
Comments are closed.