After not impressive start, Trzaskowski becomes more confident with each question.
Nawrocki seems stressed, he does not have enough experience and expertise to use this debate for his gains.
EDIT:
Trzaskowski is not attacking his opponent directly, he focuses on answering the questions, uses his experience from governing Warsaw to back his claims and declaration.
Nawrocki, on the contrary to his stance during debate with Mentzen focuses on supporting Law and Justice government by repeating declarations from 2015 campaign. He seems inconsistent, just a moment ago he was attacking Morawiecki and Kaczyński and today he glorifies them.
EDIT 2:
Has Nawrocki just snorted something during live debate?
EDIT 3:
Solid performance of Trzaskowski. Nawrocki was lost and chaotic. Hopefully tomorrow’s debate between Trzaskowski and Mentzen will be more interesting.
EDIT 4:
Both participants are rather moderate when it comes to personal attacks.
Unconvincing Nawrocki was unable to response about questions related to his hooligan youth and possible relations with members of organized crime.
Failed attempt to criticize Trzaskowski policies as mayor of Warsaw.
Accurate Trzaskowski’s question about presidential pardon and… again Nawrocki unknowingly criticized Andrzej Duda.
Not much to add from Nawrocki’s side. ‘”To się nie mieści w pale…” – ridiculous.
I would rather drink
Trzaskowski sprawia wrażenie jakby leciał na pamięć, minimalna reakcja na słowa Nawrockiego, tylko powierzchowne odwoływanie się. Nie było takich przypadków z jego strony, jak np. przeciwne, gdy Nawrocki wytknął mu pomylenie dat z wojną na Ukrainie. W kwestii odpowiedzi tych 1:30 czasu jest remis, czasem nawet ze wskazaniem na Trzaskowskiego, przygotowany jest dobrze. Ale w ripostach (30 s) regularnie dużo lepiej Nawrocki bo jest reakcja a nie recytowanie z pamięci.
Edit: reakcja na zdjęcie. Trzaskowski kompletnie nie wiedział jak się zachować. Teraz już można mieć pewność. On jest znakomicie ustawiony i przygotowany, ale gra jak w teatrze, nie ma tam nic od siebie.
Edit2: dzięki za komentarz i zwrócenie uwagi, przepraszam za obrażenie aktorów, faktycznie aktor teratralny daje dużo od siebie, to ciężka praca. Pozwoliłem sobie na uproszczenie dla jasności przekazu, absolutnie nie chciałem nikogo tym urazić.
[deleted]
They should kiss.
Very close performance of both, but with an edge for Trzaskowski. However, the progress Nawrocki has made is ridiculous. Whereas Trzaskowski seemingly goes from memory, let me give a response which despite coming across as spontaneous, it’s so presidential that it’s basically perfect
Trzaskowski asks why is he speaking in “the language of Russia”, i.e., supporting its aims
Nawrocki’s response: “Exactly what this is about: I speak in the language of Poles. I speak in the language of Poles who have their own agenda. In the West, and in the East. When President Zelenskyy treats us badly, we have the right to say this, and millions of Poles would like to say this. Yet, they can’t, because immediately they’re accused of speaking in the language of Russian propaganda.
He goes on for one more minute, with the quality somewhat deteriorating, but these 30secs is what’s going to spread
Edit: come to think of it, Trzaskowski comes across as arrogant, constantly dismissing Nawrocki.
Widzę, że jest wielka debata co niuchnął Nawrocki. Co to mógł być za specyfik? Kolega pyta 😛
Nawrocki is dumb af, I can not find any reason to vote for him.
Trzaskowski called for demagog to fact-check, and they did. He lied, multiple times too. He also personaly attacked not only braun but also mentzen, pretty much forcing their voters to go for Nawrocki. Idk what he was thinking
I prefer to distance myself from this artificial and deceitful environment of politicians (for example, Trzaskowski’s smile), but if the elections are won by a guy connected with usurers, criminals, and hooligans, it will only remind me again what kind of electorate PiS has—concrete idiots
Exactly what I expected:
-PiS this
-PO that
-but PiS
-and what about PO?
Only thing it changed is that Trzaskowski alienated Braun and Mentzen electrocate. Waste of time watching this.
Polish people lost.
But also Nawrocki did very well. You can say that Trzaskowski won, but in my opinion Nawrocki played well to undecided right wing electorate. He disarmed some of Trzaskowski punches and Trzaskowski had few weak answers
Even if you think Trzaskowski „won” arguments, I think Nawrocki potentially gained more here. It’s all about mobilising electorate.
Cóż, nie oglądałem i nie zamierzam, ale gratuluję Trzaskowskiemu, albo współczuję, nie wiem.
14 comments
Ktòry to ten Alfonso?
After not impressive start, Trzaskowski becomes more confident with each question.
Nawrocki seems stressed, he does not have enough experience and expertise to use this debate for his gains.
EDIT:
Trzaskowski is not attacking his opponent directly, he focuses on answering the questions, uses his experience from governing Warsaw to back his claims and declaration.
Nawrocki, on the contrary to his stance during debate with Mentzen focuses on supporting Law and Justice government by repeating declarations from 2015 campaign. He seems inconsistent, just a moment ago he was attacking Morawiecki and Kaczyński and today he glorifies them.
EDIT 2:
Has Nawrocki just snorted something during live debate?
EDIT 3:
Solid performance of Trzaskowski. Nawrocki was lost and chaotic. Hopefully tomorrow’s debate between Trzaskowski and Mentzen will be more interesting.
EDIT 4:
Both participants are rather moderate when it comes to personal attacks.
Unconvincing Nawrocki was unable to response about questions related to his hooligan youth and possible relations with members of organized crime.
Failed attempt to criticize Trzaskowski policies as mayor of Warsaw.
Accurate Trzaskowski’s question about presidential pardon and… again Nawrocki unknowingly criticized Andrzej Duda.
Not much to add from Nawrocki’s side. ‘”To się nie mieści w pale…” – ridiculous.
I would rather drink
Trzaskowski sprawia wrażenie jakby leciał na pamięć, minimalna reakcja na słowa Nawrockiego, tylko powierzchowne odwoływanie się. Nie było takich przypadków z jego strony, jak np. przeciwne, gdy Nawrocki wytknął mu pomylenie dat z wojną na Ukrainie. W kwestii odpowiedzi tych 1:30 czasu jest remis, czasem nawet ze wskazaniem na Trzaskowskiego, przygotowany jest dobrze. Ale w ripostach (30 s) regularnie dużo lepiej Nawrocki bo jest reakcja a nie recytowanie z pamięci.
Edit: reakcja na zdjęcie. Trzaskowski kompletnie nie wiedział jak się zachować. Teraz już można mieć pewność. On jest znakomicie ustawiony i przygotowany, ale gra jak w teatrze, nie ma tam nic od siebie.
Edit2: dzięki za komentarz i zwrócenie uwagi, przepraszam za obrażenie aktorów, faktycznie aktor teratralny daje dużo od siebie, to ciężka praca. Pozwoliłem sobie na uproszczenie dla jasności przekazu, absolutnie nie chciałem nikogo tym urazić.
[deleted]
They should kiss.
Very close performance of both, but with an edge for Trzaskowski. However, the progress Nawrocki has made is ridiculous. Whereas Trzaskowski seemingly goes from memory, let me give a response which despite coming across as spontaneous, it’s so presidential that it’s basically perfect
Trzaskowski asks why is he speaking in “the language of Russia”, i.e., supporting its aims
Nawrocki’s response: “Exactly what this is about: I speak in the language of Poles. I speak in the language of Poles who have their own agenda. In the West, and in the East. When President Zelenskyy treats us badly, we have the right to say this, and millions of Poles would like to say this. Yet, they can’t, because immediately they’re accused of speaking in the language of Russian propaganda.
He goes on for one more minute, with the quality somewhat deteriorating, but these 30secs is what’s going to spread
Edit: come to think of it, Trzaskowski comes across as arrogant, constantly dismissing Nawrocki.
Widzę, że jest wielka debata co niuchnął Nawrocki. Co to mógł być za specyfik? Kolega pyta 😛
Nawrocki is dumb af, I can not find any reason to vote for him.
Trzaskowski called for demagog to fact-check, and they did. He lied, multiple times too. He also personaly attacked not only braun but also mentzen, pretty much forcing their voters to go for Nawrocki. Idk what he was thinking
I prefer to distance myself from this artificial and deceitful environment of politicians (for example, Trzaskowski’s smile), but if the elections are won by a guy connected with usurers, criminals, and hooligans, it will only remind me again what kind of electorate PiS has—concrete idiots
Exactly what I expected:
-PiS this
-PO that
-but PiS
-and what about PO?
Only thing it changed is that Trzaskowski alienated Braun and Mentzen electrocate. Waste of time watching this.
Polish people lost.
But also Nawrocki did very well. You can say that Trzaskowski won, but in my opinion Nawrocki played well to undecided right wing electorate. He disarmed some of Trzaskowski punches and Trzaskowski had few weak answers
Even if you think Trzaskowski „won” arguments, I think Nawrocki potentially gained more here. It’s all about mobilising electorate.
Cóż, nie oglądałem i nie zamierzam, ale gratuluję Trzaskowskiemu, albo współczuję, nie wiem.
W każdym razie i tak na niego nie zagłosuję.
Comments are closed.