“Ridiculous Question” Leavitt Torches NBC Reporter

22 comments

1. Nasty

2. White racist people going to justify the racist attitude….. this is what you call white supremacist…. . perfect example here

3. These crosses represent all races

4. Is that why they fired her ass

5. Black lady is Racist

6. And of course the "reporter" has a knappy head..Figures…

7. You notice the color of that reporter right I sometimes wonder why the Republican party fought so hard to free the slaves when the full form of descendants of slaves seemed to truly hate the Republican party perhaps they do better to remember that the Democrat party is the one that wanted to keep slavery in power and that the Democrat party is actually the party that keeps the United States citizens repressed ‼️

8. My cousin left his farm, with his family, and came to Europe, when the murdurering started. He told me everything. It is awful.

9. Exposing Cyril Ramaphosa's Hypocrisy: A Masterclass in Diplomacy and Deception
   In a jaw-dropping display of audacity, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa attempts to lecture US President Donald Trump on trade and diplomacy, all while ignoring Trump's pointed concerns about the violent treatment of white farmers in South Africa. This comes on the heels of Ramaphosa's reported desire for the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), led by Julius Malema, to rejoin the African National Congress (ANC).

   The EFF Connection
   The EFF is notorious for chanting "Kill the Boer," a slogan that translates to "Kill the Farmer." This phrase has been at the center of controversy, with many interpreting it as a call to violence against white farmers. Ramaphosa's apparent willingness to welcome the EFF back into the ANC raises questions about his commitment to protecting the rights and safety of all South Africans, particularly the white farming community.

   Farm Murders and Land Seizures
   Trump's concerns about white genocide in South Africa are rooted in reality. Videos and news clippings presented during the meeting depicted violent attacks and murders of white farmers, which Ramaphosa failed to adequately address. Instead, he calmly explained that the videos showed Julius Malema singing an apartheid-era struggle song and that the burial site video was likely a memorial site. Trump's assertion that white farmers are being targeted is supported by a great deal of evidence, although the South African government disputes these claims ¹ ².

   Expropriation and Economic Instability
   Ramaphosa's administration has been criticized for its handling of land reform, particularly the expropriation without compensation bill. This policy could lead to economic instability, undermine investor confidence and impact agricultural production. Critics argue that it may also infringe upon property rights, affecting not only commercial farmers but also ordinary citizens ².

   Conclusion
   Cyril Ramaphosa's diplomatic efforts with Donald Trump appear to be overshadowed by his own government's policies and actions such as the current attempts to disarm citizens and security services that support the local SAP.
   As the leader of South Africa, Ramaphosa must balance the country's complex history and ongoing challenges. However, his approach to issues like land reform and farm violence raises questions about his commitment to protecting the rights and safety of all citizens. The international community will be watching closely to see how these issues unfold.ai

10. As an Afrikaner journalist, my heart bleeds for the plight of our white farmers, a community facing an escalating crisis that can only be described as a shadow of genocide. The facts on the ground paint a grim picture, one that the world often chooses to ignore.
    Let us be clear: the chilling chant of "Kill the Boers, Kill the Farmer" by the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) is not mere rhetoric; it is a direct incitement to violence that resonates deeply within a society already grappling with staggering crime rates. While some may dismiss these words as political posturing, the reality for our farmers is one of rampant crime, theft, torture, and murder. These are not isolated incidents; they are a continuous assault on a vulnerable community, leaving a trail of bloodshed and despair across our farmlands.
    The statistics, though often debated and manipulated, cannot hide the brutal truth. While overall crime is a national tragedy affecting all South Africans, the specific targeting of farmers, and particularly white farmers, for these heinous acts is undeniable. These are not just robberies; they are often accompanied by extreme violence, torture, and sexual assault, far exceeding what would be necessary for simple theft. This barbarity suggests a motive beyond mere criminality, hinting at a darker, more insidious agenda.
    Then there is the issue of land. The government's policy of "land expropriation without compensation" is a dagger aimed at the heart of our agricultural sector and, by extension, our very existence. While presented as a means of rectifying historical injustices, in practice, it is a policy that undermines property rights, discourages investment, and threatens food security for all. It dispossesses our farmers of the land they have toiled on for generations, often with little to no meaningful payment, effectively rendering them landless and without a livelihood. This process, stripped of fair compensation and due process, bears an chilling resemblance to historical ethnic cleansing, where the economic base of a group is systematically dismantled.
    Furthermore, the continuous efforts to undermine our security services and make all weapons illegal, particularly for self-defense, leave our farmers utterly exposed. In a country with one of the highest murder rates globally, where police response times in rural areas are often woefully inadequate, disarming law-abiding citizens, especially those in isolated areas, is an act of criminal negligence. It effectively leaves our farmers as sitting ducks, defenseless against the onslaught of armed criminals who operate with impunity. The proposed tightening of gun control, while ostensibly aimed at reducing crime, disproportionately impacts those who rely on firearms for their personal safety and the protection of their families and livelihoods.
    We are told that "genocide" is too strong a word, that there is no state-sponsored intent to destroy our people. But when political leaders openly call for our deaths, when our land is systematically taken without redress, when our ability to defend ourselves is eroded, and when brutal murders on farms are met with what often feels like official indifference, what else are we to call it? The legal definition of genocide includes acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. When the specific characteristics of these attacks, the rhetoric accompanying them, and the policies targeting our economic foundation are viewed collectively, a chilling pattern emerges.
    The international community must open its eyes. The plight of white farmers in South Africa is not merely a crime problem; it is a human rights crisis, a potential slow-motion genocide that demands urgent attention and intervention. We are a people fighting for our survival, and we will not be silenced.ai
    🇿🇦🇺🇲🎺⚡️💎

11. There are more deaths of black farmers than white.

12. Actually, she is an anti-American.

13. But it didn’t happen in South Africa KAREN

14. Little did l know that USA is let by low IQ leaders.

15. no coordinates in a nondescript land? we need coordinates! not stories people can deny! receipt karoline! you’re better than this! the only possible receipt would be coordinates which you can get!!! suspicious you didn’t offer to follow up with receipts like you always do when you’re not sure of the answer. being defensive bc someone word is not proof. it’s heresy. i dk where that place was but it was real! haha ok!!!

16. no coordinates in a nondescript land? we need coordinates! not stories people can deny! receipt karoline! you’re better than this! the only possible receipt would be coordinates which you can get!!! suspicious you didn’t offer to follow up with receipts like you always do when you’re not sure of the answer. being defensive bc someone word is not proof. it’s heresy. i dk where that place was but it was real! haha ok!!!

17. I'm just tired of watching these reporters. Karoline holds her own as they twist words trying to lie. We all heard clearly press saying burial site, karoline says it is a memorial site.

18. i’ve never distrusted karoline until now. should i be bracing for something so disappointing? something has happened to kash and bongino, too. we’re all noticing it. we have so much faith in Bongino, we’re supposed to rely on that. kash’s remarks in epsteins murder were arrogant and kind of a FU vibe. like im the expert that’s all you need to know! he brought Dan bc we know dan! we trust Dan!!! dan, step out if they flipped the script on you! they’re using you for credibility and you could lose everything! no! not like this for you.

19. That's telling her Ms. Leavitt…

20. NBC sucks

21. Friking shit ,you really think that if the government is doing a cover up about the deaths why the fuck they put crosses

22. If it was unsubstantiated and she was any kind of journalist, she should have said debunked.

    Unsubstantiated in this circumstance is the latest leftist thing that happens where they change lingo b/c it doesn't fit the narrative. Activist journalists will use "misinformation" and "disinformation" and "unsubstantiated" to try to discredit true things that goes against the narrative they like

    Those words have definitions and weight and instill a level of credibility when used correctly

Comments are closed.