Tank Combat in Gaza- June 2025 by spetznaz11 Tags:Combat FootageConflicts 29 comments Bravery Combat? Who? What? What? They always cut the footage before the smoke clears. Every single time 🙂 And not the first time. Kind of blind in the tank. The new Merkava will have 360° camera coverage . Blind ahh tank Was it enough to disable it or worse? The balls on these guys I would not want to be in that tank, but note that as usual the hamas video is conveniently cut to not show if there was an effect Interesting. No secondaries. Certainly rang their bells inside, but doubt any serious damage was done. they would have shown it, not cut away immediately afterwards. Looks like a child placed it. So at least we have some possible evidence for child soldiers being used. Also, I thought Putler vs Ukraine has reminded armies that tanks absolutely require infantry support. Why was a sapper allowed to get that close? It’s like one second the IDF shines, and the very next some country bumpkin seems to be running it. That is some saving private Ryan technique [removed] Not sure why that tank is operating in an area without ground forces to help mitigate this kind of attack … Balls The tank was slightly agitated from this. Should have went for the mobility kill and shoved it inside the track And this is why we don’t run armor without infantry support [removed] No infantry over watch for the tank? It took him 3s to run away…..crazy! 2m is about 6 foot 5 I think. So at the rear he’d be the same height. The front is a lot lower Maybe damaged the tank a little on one end I guess they were saving money on fuses. Cant spare an inch. That was a very short time delay. Brave but I dont think that did any damage lol Oh, that type of tank combat My question is where is the dismounted support? Have we not learned the dangers of having armour by itself in a built up area? Btw this video is from iof , not from the other side . I feel like I’ve seen a video just like this before. So usually you want infantry to support armor just for this reason. However in this combat zone having infantry out will just get them sniped. Comments are closed.
I would not want to be in that tank, but note that as usual the hamas video is conveniently cut to not show if there was an effect
No secondaries. Certainly rang their bells inside, but doubt any serious damage was done. they would have shown it, not cut away immediately afterwards. Looks like a child placed it. So at least we have some possible evidence for child soldiers being used. Also, I thought Putler vs Ukraine has reminded armies that tanks absolutely require infantry support. Why was a sapper allowed to get that close? It’s like one second the IDF shines, and the very next some country bumpkin seems to be running it.
Not sure why that tank is operating in an area without ground forces to help mitigate this kind of attack …
My question is where is the dismounted support? Have we not learned the dangers of having armour by itself in a built up area?
So usually you want infantry to support armor just for this reason. However in this combat zone having infantry out will just get them sniped.
29 comments
Bravery
Combat? Who? What?
What?
They always cut the footage before the smoke clears. Every single time 🙂
And not the first time. Kind of blind in the tank. The new Merkava will have 360° camera coverage .
Blind ahh tank
Was it enough to disable it or worse?
The balls on these guys
I would not want to be in that tank, but note that as usual the hamas video is conveniently cut to not show if there was an effect
Interesting.
No secondaries.
Certainly rang their bells inside, but doubt any serious damage was done. they would have shown it, not cut away immediately afterwards.
Looks like a child placed it. So at least we have some possible evidence for child soldiers being used.
Also, I thought Putler vs Ukraine has reminded armies that tanks absolutely require infantry support.
Why was a sapper allowed to get that close? It’s like one second the IDF shines, and the very next some country bumpkin seems to be running it.
That is some saving private Ryan technique
[removed]
Not sure why that tank is operating in an area without ground forces to help mitigate this kind of attack …
Balls
The tank was slightly agitated from this.
Should have went for the mobility kill and shoved it inside the track
And this is why we don’t run armor without infantry support
[removed]
No infantry over watch for the tank?
It took him 3s to run away…..crazy!
2m is about 6 foot 5 I think. So at the rear he’d be the same height. The front is a lot lower
Maybe damaged the tank a little on one end
I guess they were saving money on fuses. Cant spare an inch.
That was a very short time delay.
Brave but I dont think that did any damage lol
Oh, that type of tank combat
My question is where is the dismounted support? Have we not learned the dangers of having armour by itself in a built up area?
Btw this video is from iof , not from the other side .
I feel like I’ve seen a video just like this before.
So usually you want infantry to support armor just for this reason. However in this combat zone having infantry out will just get them sniped.
Comments are closed.