primeimages / iStock.com
DOGE, or the Department of Government Efficiency, was meant to help save money for Americans. But the reality is different.
According to the DOGE website, their efforts to slash costs such as eliminating certain types of federal spending and reversing some regulations, have resulted in around $180 billion in savings. As a result of these savings, DOGE claims that it has saved taxpayers $1,118.01 each.
Find Out: 4 Mistakes the Upper Middle Class Are Making With Their Money in the Trump Economy
Try This: Mark Cuban Says Trump’s Executive Order To Lower Medication Costs Has a ‘Real Shot’ — Here’s Why
However, according to many media outlets like Reuters and third-party analyses like “Musk Watch,” the savings are really only around one tenth of that. What’s more, regulations that have been or could be eliminated will end up costing Americans more in the long run.
So what are the regulations?
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) rule capping credit card late fees to $8. The CFPB predicted that there would have been average savings of $220 per year for around 45 million Americans who were on the hook for these fees.
The New York Times reports that DOGE claims reversing this rule will save Americans $9.5 billion. Considering the average credit card late fee is $32, American consumers may not truly benefit from this law reversal. It’s unclear how DOGE came up with these savings, since credit card companies may not lower their late fees anytime soon.
Learn More: Trump Isn’t Ruling Out a Recession This Year — What Could That Mean for Your Wallet?
According to the DOGE leaderboard on its website, there was a combined $4 billion in savings for Americans by reversing 16 efficiency standards on appliances by the Energy Department. Appliance efficiency standards are there to help American households save on utility bills.
Estimates by government scientists show that efficiency standards for appliances saved around $576 for the average American household in 2025 when it came to gas and water bills. Reversing these standards could mean that costs that could go down over time for Americans will be no more.
There are even reports that appliance manufacturers don’t want these reversal of standards as it’ll also cost them more in the long run. For example, if states end up mandating their own standards, there could be conflicting ones. As such, it could mean that manufacturers will have to make different appliances to meet different state regulations, costing them more in time and overhead costs.
Story Continues