No jail time for B.C. man with ‘relatively modest’ child porn collection, judge rules

https://www.ctvnews.ca/vancouver/article/no-jail-time-for-bc-man-with-relatively-modest-child-porn-collection-judge-rules/

Posted by SunderedValley

5 comments
  1. Kiddy fiddlers are all out there now wondering how big a CP collection has to be before it becomes ‘thoroughly immodest’ and thereby worthy of jail. For science and out of idle curiosity, of course.

  2. Yeah, he still should have gotten at least a year of jail time. CP shouldn’t be taken lightly. I get that his sentence shouldn’t be as high as other predetors who have and distribute thousands of CP images, but no sentence at all is very weak

  3. If having a “big collection” is an aggravating factor, not having a big collection should be considered non-aggravating. Also, dude plead guilty of the charges.

  4. Relative modest? Bro what are they trying to be like Japan where child prostitute is a common thing.

    Insane like bro CP already bad but calling it relative modest is just plain stupid.

  5. These abreviations are yoo much. Know one knows what B.C. is supposed to mean! I gad to search on google to find out its British Colombia, a Canadian province in the West Coast,

Comments are closed.