“Niemand heeft er zaken mee of je een spuitje zet of niet. En dat blijft beter zo.’
Sorry, disagree. When you not getting your shot means the other 90% who did get theirs also have to suffer reduced freedom, then it becomes their business. Even more so because not getting the shot actively endangers those who can’t get it.
Also, has MDW never heard of the Polio shot? We all have to get it and Kind & Gezin follows up on this. So apparently it is K&G’s business whether we got a shot and MDW is fine with that one?
I’m all for privacy and support many of the fights the ministry of privacy fights (such as fingerprint on IDs) but the above quote I strongly disagree with.
mongool
Also, de Amerikaanse playbook van donaties vragen voor frivole rechtszaken (en t meeste in uw eigen zak steken) heeft het hier ook al gehaald. Ge moet de scammers niks leren, nee.
He does good work but he is wrong on this one. Medical files are already shared with 3th parties for certain jobs (Tetanus). You also get a QR code for different kind of reasons (vaccinated/negative test/ already had corona) so the CST doesn’t really says if someone is vaccinated or not. The name of his campaign is also rather childish. I’m disappointed in Mathias.
There is a stupidly easy solution to this entire patchwork bullshit. Make vaccination mandatory, but the federal government doesn’t have the balls for that. Better to come up with pointless shit that skirts the rules in the hopes of everything turning out fine.
If it’s unlawful: fair point. But his logic is “because there are other things you can do” according to the article.
9 comments
Ga toch voor een ander hol kreften.
niet onlogisch, puur vanuit privacy standpunt is CST gewoon heel erg slecht geïmplementeerd.
Meer info nog op de website van het initiatief: [https://covidshitticket.be/](https://covidshitticket.be/)
“Niemand heeft er zaken mee of je een spuitje zet of niet. En dat blijft beter zo.’
Sorry, disagree. When you not getting your shot means the other 90% who did get theirs also have to suffer reduced freedom, then it becomes their business. Even more so because not getting the shot actively endangers those who can’t get it.
Also, has MDW never heard of the Polio shot? We all have to get it and Kind & Gezin follows up on this. So apparently it is K&G’s business whether we got a shot and MDW is fine with that one?
I’m all for privacy and support many of the fights the ministry of privacy fights (such as fingerprint on IDs) but the above quote I strongly disagree with.
mongool
Also, de Amerikaanse playbook van donaties vragen voor frivole rechtszaken (en t meeste in uw eigen zak steken) heeft het hier ook al gehaald. Ge moet de scammers niks leren, nee.
He does good work but he is wrong on this one. Medical files are already shared with 3th parties for certain jobs (Tetanus). You also get a QR code for different kind of reasons (vaccinated/negative test/ already had corona) so the CST doesn’t really says if someone is vaccinated or not. The name of his campaign is also rather childish. I’m disappointed in Mathias.
There is a stupidly easy solution to this entire patchwork bullshit. Make vaccination mandatory, but the federal government doesn’t have the balls for that. Better to come up with pointless shit that skirts the rules in the hopes of everything turning out fine.
If it’s unlawful: fair point. But his logic is “because there are other things you can do” according to the article.
That’s not on the level I expected from him.