I thought they were the pilots, thanks for clarifying!
‘Wheels’ eh? Well that explains why the plane didn’t just simply grip onto the building wall with it’s feet like a bird. Marvelous stuff. 👍
I saw so many awful racist comments on the BBC’s YouTube channel on this story. I’ll take any levity I can get.
That’s those things Ryanair try to smash
*You have used five centimetres of tape. God bless you.*
r/FatherTed
Of they’re wheels, how else would it drive through the sky
Big if true.
There’s no arrows, how are we supposed to know where they are?
you can tell it’s intelligent because it has the wireframe lines on
It’s the news. They generally tend to aim for the lowest common denominator, even if it seems basic and condescending. They have to be explicit in their definition because being implicit opens the information to subjective interpretation (yes, even when it’s obviously wheels in question).
12 comments
Ohhhh THAT’S what they are.
I thought they were the pilots, thanks for clarifying!
‘Wheels’ eh? Well that explains why the plane didn’t just simply grip onto the building wall with it’s feet like a bird. Marvelous stuff. 👍
I saw so many awful racist comments on the BBC’s YouTube channel on this story. I’ll take any levity I can get.
That’s those things Ryanair try to smash
*You have used five centimetres of tape. God bless you.*
r/FatherTed
Of they’re wheels, how else would it drive through the sky
Big if true.
There’s no arrows, how are we supposed to know where they are?
you can tell it’s intelligent because it has the wireframe lines on
It’s the news. They generally tend to aim for the lowest common denominator, even if it seems basic and condescending. They have to be explicit in their definition because being implicit opens the information to subjective interpretation (yes, even when it’s obviously wheels in question).
I don’t understand if there’s no red circle
Comments are closed.