Peers criticise £9.6m House of Lords front door

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cj427p80vvxo.amp

Posted by TheNicestQuail

4 comments

  1. It looks like OP posted an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of [concerns over privacy and the Open Web](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot).

    Maybe check out **the canonical page** instead: **[https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj427p80vvxo](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj427p80vvxo)**

    *****

    ^(I’m a bot | )[^(Why & About)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot)^( | )[^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/)

  2. I get that it needs to be accessible, but apparently it’s not even accessible. It doesn’t even work properly. Nice to know we’re getting good value!

  3. Could have built a new hospitals wing for that much money, ludicrous.

Comments are closed.