Sam Altman claims an average ChatGPT query uses ‘roughly one fifteenth of a teaspoon’ of water

5 comments

1. I can’t fathom why engagement use puts their servers to requiring anymore water than it’s already submerged in.

   Just keep cycling the stuff. Or, I don’t know, dump all this server garbage and make AI local already.

   No one’s bandwidth of relative queries requires 999 teraflops of computing capacity.

2. Seems like this could be drastically improved by circulating water underground – he’ll build a pipeline up to the north and bring it back again

3. Would that be as cooling, the electro chemical energy or my suggestion the rest mass energy of 25 GWh.

4. Why compare it to water? Who runs electronics on water? Why not just compare it to actual wattage? Lol

5. Hes lying.  AI is energy intensive.  Im not saying dont use it, but its not .0000000578 tsps of water or whatever

Comments are closed.