Russia’s weapons stockpile revealed. “Russia has more than 1,950 strategic missiles of various types… (and) produces up to 195 missiles per month”

14 comments

1. Not very helpful. How many does Russia use on average per month? How many did they have 6 months ago? A year?

   If they produce close to 200 a month but use 400 a month, then they’ll be out of them within 10 months. If on the other hand production outstrips use, then they will stockpile more and more.

   I wish these “journalists” would journal a little harder.

2. If it is it’s going broke even faster than we thought

3. But do they have that many launchers? I know for Iran at least, they have a vast arsenal of missiles but Israel considers the launchers to be prime targets since that’s the bottleneck.

4. A lot of their stockpile is soviet-missiles with glide bomb attachments? Or is it newly produced missiles?

5. The ideal would be the brave and Ukrainian warriors who practically alone are at war with Russia – China – Coreira do Norte – Belarus and now even the United States Maga with very hand operations destroy missile deposits.

6. Also are these including stockpile numbers that have spawned a few small suns on the Russian horizon in the last few months? On paper stocks often don’t match actuality. You really think Russia will admit half or even a quarter of these were blown in ammo storage? I get this Ukrainian intelligence source but it still relies on Russian “intelligence” on quantities. Seems more like a scare “Russian SAM systems are the most advanced in the world and NATO planes are no match for them” yet we saw how those old systems helped IRAN and deep strikes in Russia. Also the intercept rate on Russian missiles even hypersonic and ballistics not terrible now.

7. Point in fact no conventionally armed or even short range nuclear armed missile is strategic.

8. So, why does everyone here love to downplay the threat and capability of Russia? Isn’t it counter intuitive if you want Ukraine to get as much assistance as possible?

   It’s not like anyone really knows their exact stockpiles.

9. Tactical, not strategic. This count is talking about conventional IRBMs, not Nuclear ICBMs. 

10. The problem is, those rockets don’t help them if they keep failing on the battlefield. The type of scum they’re using for their efforts in Ukraine is luckily too stupid to learn from their mistakes. Years of grinding without anything to show for. The rockets are only good to terrorize the civilian population, and they will stay strong.

11. Isn’t that the picture of a Ukrainian Hrim-2 launcher?

12. “Up to” does not mean anything, it is marketing weasel words.

13. used to.

14. Ohhh we have all these missles yet cannot fight a overwhelming battle against a much smaller force in ukraine , why would they say this ?

Comments are closed.