If flown with a crap ton of them and they were all solid as sh/t.
Misleading. India has a high PERCENTAGE of female pilots because there are so few pilots (only 10k) so only about 1,200 total female pilots
The visual scale comparisons here feel misleading. E.g. India (12.4%) is a little more than twice US (5.5%), but the India bar length is about 3x US’s.
Women will tend to go more into traditional male occupations the less actual prosperity and gender equality there is, as that is the way to better salaries and social position.
What data did the study use to assert the gender of each individual?
The title of the graphic is wrong. Most is the numerical total, not the greatest proportion.
This isn’t beautiful data. The scale is weird. Are we meant to look at area or length of the charts? Neither is correct, e.g. the India one is far bigger than 3x the Hong Kong one.
14 comments
Downvoting – because – that us not a beautiful data vidualization, it’s not even good or ledgible for the smaller data points.
What the hell is going on in that career?
I wish the actual map was a little smaller.
Does this mean 12.4% of all female pilots in the world are from India or 12.4% of all pilots in India are female?
Is this yours? Because your post title is really what is ought to say on the graphic. The title on the graphic isn’t accurate to what is shown.
“oc” yeah sure buddy, [this instagram post](https://www.instagram.com/p/C34NxOhIV2b/) is from a year ago and they aren’t even the OC either lol
I just call women pilots what they are. pilots.
If flown with a crap ton of them and they were all solid as sh/t.
Misleading. India has a high PERCENTAGE of female pilots because there are so few pilots (only 10k) so only about 1,200 total female pilots
The visual scale comparisons here feel misleading. E.g. India (12.4%) is a little more than twice US (5.5%), but the India bar length is about 3x US’s.
Women will tend to go more into traditional male occupations the less actual prosperity and gender equality there is, as that is the way to better salaries and social position.
What data did the study use to assert the gender of each individual?
The title of the graphic is wrong. Most is the numerical total, not the greatest proportion.
This isn’t beautiful data. The scale is weird. Are we meant to look at area or length of the charts? Neither is correct, e.g. the India one is far bigger than 3x the Hong Kong one.
surprised we’re not ranked last
Comments are closed.