Was that an advantage? Did Priti Patel insist on including extraterritorial waterboarding in the deal to whittle out the bogus asylum seekers?
It’s not a uk asylum claim unless you’re herded into a death camp by a child soldier.
Don’t want to end up in Rwanda don’t try to enter UK illegally. Simple.
Of all the current Tory ministers I think Patel is the most insidiously evil.
How can one fled from Ruanda all the way up to the UK?
Rwanda is very safe. The migrants can also choose to stay in France if they want now, although this may help Le Pen to victory.
“UK asylum deal” is no such thing and The Guardian should not use that terminology.
Regardless of the outcome of ‘processing’, you’re not getting into the UK if you end up in one of the Tories African concentration camps.
I appreciate the Gov wanting to make people trafficking harder for the organised crime rings that run it but this is completely the wrong approach.
We should be taking in more people.
We should be making it easier for them to claim asylum from wherever they have stopped that is currently safe, be that France or further afield in Europe by setting up more application centres.
We should be doing more to try and keep families together by resettling them in the same areas of the country so they have more of an immediate support network around them.
However, making it easier is not in the interest of the Gov and neither is making it a more streamlined process from the look of things.
This is an actual refugee and we should protect people fleeing from persecution. However, trekking across North Africa and then across Europe for a better life, doesn’t make you a refugee, sorry. I don’t blame them for wanting to come, as they live in poor countries, but you can’t seek refuge from poverty, as harsh as that is. And if we let in every poor person seeking a better life in Europe, we’ll have hundreds of millions of migrants.
The best thing we can do is to help them in their own countries, but even that is difficult due to bureaucracy and rampant corruption within NGOs and their own governments.
Unfortunately, capitalism is what is keeping these people poor.
Maybe if we stop launching insurrections and coups d’état in their own countries, and stop exploiting them for their mineral wealth, they’d have decent lives. I wonder how many Libyan refugees would have arrived if we didn’t topple Gadaffi?
Refugees are a net positive Rwanda will greatly benefit from this #DevelopAfrica
10 comments
Was that an advantage? Did Priti Patel insist on including extraterritorial waterboarding in the deal to whittle out the bogus asylum seekers?
It’s not a uk asylum claim unless you’re herded into a death camp by a child soldier.
Don’t want to end up in Rwanda don’t try to enter UK illegally. Simple.
Of all the current Tory ministers I think Patel is the most insidiously evil.
How can one fled from Ruanda all the way up to the UK?
Rwanda is very safe. The migrants can also choose to stay in France if they want now, although this may help Le Pen to victory.
“UK asylum deal” is no such thing and The Guardian should not use that terminology.
Regardless of the outcome of ‘processing’, you’re not getting into the UK if you end up in one of the Tories African concentration camps.
I appreciate the Gov wanting to make people trafficking harder for the organised crime rings that run it but this is completely the wrong approach.
We should be taking in more people.
We should be making it easier for them to claim asylum from wherever they have stopped that is currently safe, be that France or further afield in Europe by setting up more application centres.
We should be doing more to try and keep families together by resettling them in the same areas of the country so they have more of an immediate support network around them.
However, making it easier is not in the interest of the Gov and neither is making it a more streamlined process from the look of things.
This is an actual refugee and we should protect people fleeing from persecution. However, trekking across North Africa and then across Europe for a better life, doesn’t make you a refugee, sorry. I don’t blame them for wanting to come, as they live in poor countries, but you can’t seek refuge from poverty, as harsh as that is. And if we let in every poor person seeking a better life in Europe, we’ll have hundreds of millions of migrants.
The best thing we can do is to help them in their own countries, but even that is difficult due to bureaucracy and rampant corruption within NGOs and their own governments.
Unfortunately, capitalism is what is keeping these people poor.
Maybe if we stop launching insurrections and coups d’état in their own countries, and stop exploiting them for their mineral wealth, they’d have decent lives. I wonder how many Libyan refugees would have arrived if we didn’t topple Gadaffi?
Refugees are a net positive Rwanda will greatly benefit from this #DevelopAfrica